RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Modelling the impact of reducing control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in a low transmission setting
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.06.11.20127027
DO 10.1101/2020.06.11.20127027
A1 Nick Scott
A1 Anna Palmer
A1 Dominic Delport
A1 Romesh Abeysuriya
A1 Robyn Stuart
A1 Cliff C. Kerr
A1 Dina Mistry
A1 Daniel J. Klein
A1 Rachel Sacks-Davis
A1 Katie Heath
A1 Samuel Hainsworth
A1 Alisa Pedrana
A1 Mark Stoove
A1 David P. Wilson
A1 Margaret Hellard
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/12/2020.06.11.20127027.abstract
AB Aims We assessed COVID-19 epidemic risks associated with relaxing a set of physical distancing restrictions in the state of Victoria, Australia – a setting with low community transmission – in line with a national framework that aims to balance sequential policy relaxations with longer-term public health and economic need.Methods An agent-based model, Covasim, was calibrated to the local COVID-19 epidemiological and policy environment. Contact networks were modelled to capture transmission risks in households, schools and workplaces, and a variety of community spaces (e.g. public transport, parks, bars, cafes/restaurants) and activities (e.g. community or professional sports, large events). Policy changes that could prevent or reduce transmission in specific locations (e.g. opening/closing businesses) were modelled in the context of interventions that included testing, contact tracing (including via a smartphone app), and quarantine.Results Policy changes leading to the gathering of large, unstructured groups with unknown individuals (e.g. bars opening, increased public transport use) posed the greatest risk, while policy changes leading to smaller, structured gatherings with known individuals (e.g. small social gatherings) posed least risk. In the model, epidemic impact following some policy changes took more than two months to occur. Model outcomes support continuation of working from home policies to reduce public transport use, and risk mitigation strategies in the context of social venues opening, such as >30% population-uptake of a contact-tracing app, physical distancing policies within venues reducing transmissibility by >40%, or patron identification records being kept to enable >60% contact tracing.Conclusions In a low transmission setting, care should be taken to avoid lifting sequential COVID-19 policy restrictions within short time periods, as it could take more than two months to detect the consequences of any changes. These findings have implications for other settings with low community transmission where governments are beginning to lift restrictions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received for this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:No ethics were required as all data used for this modelling study were publicly available.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll parameter inputs used for this modelling study are available in the supplementary material.