PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Melese Abate Reta AU - Birhan Alemnew AU - Biruk Beletew Abate TI - Prevalence of drug resistance-conferring mutations associated with isoniazid and rifampicin resistant <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis AID - 10.1101/2020.06.07.20124958 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.06.07.20124958 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/09/2020.06.07.20124958.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/09/2020.06.07.20124958.full AB - Background Drug resistance tuberculosis (DR-TB) continues to be a major public health threat globally. Due to the development of many rapid molecular diagnostic tools to detect gene mutations in M.tuberculosis (Mtb), specific genes conferring resistance to different anti-TB drugs have been identified. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the prevalence of the gene mutations associated with rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) resistant Mtb in Ethiopia.Methods Using PRISMA guideline, we systematically searched a literature on PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus electronic databases, Cochrane library, and other database sources. The data analysis was done using STATA 11. The pooled prevalence of the gene mutations associated with resistance to RIF and INH were estimated using the random effect model. Heterogeneity was measured by the I2 statistical test, and the publication bias through the funnel plot and the Egger’s regression test.Results Among all antimycobacterial resistance tested TB patients, prevalence of resistance to any anti-TB drug was 31.3%, while multidrug resistance TB (MDR-TB), any RIF and INH resistance were 22.2%, 24.9%, and 27.9%, respectively. In total, 909 (95.8%) of 949 INH resistant Mtb isolates had detectable gene mutation in katG315 and 5.9% in the inhA gene. The meta-analysis derived an estimated pooled prevalence of katGMUT1(S315T1) in INH resistant Mtb was 89.18% (95%CI 81.94-96.43%), while a pooled inhAMUT1 (C15T) resistant Mtb prevalence was 77.48% (95% CI 57.84-97.13%). Besides, 769 (90.8%) of 847 RIF resistant strains had detectable rpoB gene mutation, commonly in rpoBMUT3(S531L) probe (550 cases). The meta-analysis resulting a pooled rpoBMUT3(S531L) resistant Mtb prevalence of 74.20 % (95%CI 66.39-82.00%).Conclusions RIF resistant Mtb isolates were spread widely, mainly with S531L mutation. Similarly, INH resistant Mtb isolates were spread with S315T1 and C15T mutations. It is significant to detect S531L among RIF resistant and S315T1 and C15T mutations among INH resistant isolates as it may be a determinant for subsequent development of MDR-TB. Rapid diagnosis of RIF and INH resistant Mtb strains in TB patients would expedite modification of treatment regimens, and proper infection control interventions could be taken on time to reduce the risk of further development and transmission of MDR-TB.Highlights Tuberculosis(TB), particularly drug resistance TB (DR-TB) continues to be a major public health threat globally. Herein, we used a systematic literature search on reliable electronic databases, and perform a meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of the gene mutations associated with rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) resistant Mtb in Ethiopia. The meta-analysis derived an estimated pooled prevalence of katGMUT1 (S315T1) in INH resistant Mtb was 89.18% (95%CI 81.94-96.43%), while inhAMUT1(C15T) resistant Mtb prevalence was 77.48% (95% CI 57.84-97.13%). Besides, among 90.8% of RIF resistant strains which had detectable rpoB gene mutation, a pooled S531L resistant Mtb prevalence was 74.20% (95%CI 66.39-82.00%). This review revealed that the RIF resistant Mtb strains were spread widely, mainly with S531L mutation, while the INH resistant Mtb isolates were spread widely with S315T1 and C15T mutations. So, it is significant to detect S531L among RIF resistant and S315T1 and C15T mutations among INH resistant isolates as it may be a determinant for subsequent development of MDR-TB. Rapid diagnosis of RIF and INH resistant Mtb strains in TB patients would expedite alteration of treatment regimens, and proper infection control interventions could be taken on time to reduce the risk of further development and transmission of MDR-TB.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not ApplicableAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets anlyzed during this review can be accessed from the corrosponding author upon reasonable request.DR-TBdrug resistant tuberculosisDSTdrug susceptibility testingDS-TBdrug senstetive tuberculosisINHisoniazidMDR-TBmultidrug resistant tuberculosisMtbMycobacterium tuberculosisPRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-analysisRIFrifampicinTBtuberculosisWHOworld health organizationXDR-TBextensive drug resistance TB.