PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Bhavin Vasavada AU - Hardik Patel TI - Laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy- An updated metaanalysis of randomised control trials for short term outcomes AID - 10.1101/2020.04.12.20062562 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.04.12.20062562 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/05/2020.04.12.20062562.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/05/2020.04.12.20062562.full AB - Introduction Aim of this metaanalysis was to compare short term outcomes of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Material and methods EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and the Cochrane Database were searched for randomised control trials comparing outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomies with those patients undergoing open gastrectomies. The primary outcome was 30 day morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes studied included length of stay, blood loss, d2gastrectomies, lymphnode retrieval, operative time, distal gastrectomy, wound complications and intraabdominal complications Systemic review and Metaanalysis were done according to MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines.Results Morbidity was significantly low in laparoscopic group(P=0.004).There was no significant difference between mortality between the two groups. (P=0.989). There less wound complications in laparoscpic group, no difference intra-abdominal complications in both the groups. Operative time was significantly higher in laparoscopic group. (P< 0.001) wmd 56.904. Hospital stay was similar in laparoscopic group. (P=0.305) wmd –0.533 days. Blood loss was significantly lesser in laparoscopic group.(p <0.001). Laparoscopic group patients had less number of lymph node retrieval compared to laparoscopic group.(p< 0.001). Laparoscopic group also contained similar advanced staged gastric cancer than open gastrectomies.Conclusions Laparoscopic gastrectomies were associated with better short term outcomes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding Statementno funding receivedAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Yesmeta analysis- data collected from published paperRCTrandomized control trialWMDWeighted Mean DifferenceC.IConfidence IntervalsSDStandard deviations