PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Alviset, S.
AU  - Riller, Q.
AU  - Aboab, J.
AU  - Dilworth, K.
AU  - Billy, PA.
AU  - Lombardi, Y.
AU  - Azzi, M.
AU  - Ferreira, Vargas L.
AU  - Laine, L.
AU  - Lermuzeaux, M.
AU  - Memain, N.
AU  - Silva, D.
AU  - Tchoubou, T.
AU  - Ushmorova, D.
AU  - Dabbagh, H.
AU  - Escoda, S.
AU  - Lefrançois, R.
AU  - Nardi, A.
AU  - Ngima, A.
AU  - Ioos, V.
TI  - Continuous positive airway pressure face-mask ventilation to manage massive influx of patients requiring respiratory support during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak
AID  - 10.1101/2020.06.01.20118018
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.06.01.20118018
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/03/2020.06.01.20118018.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/03/2020.06.01.20118018.full
AB  - Background Since December 2019, a global outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is responsible for massive influx of patients with acute respiratory failure in hospitals. We describe the characteristics, clinical course, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in a large public hospital in France.Method It is a single centre retrospective observational cohort. From 27th March to 23rd April, consecutive patients receiving 10 to 15 l/min of oxygen with a nonrebreather mask, who had signs of respiratory failure or were unable to maintain an SpO2 > 90%, were treated by CPAP with a face-mask unless the ICU physician judged that immediate intubation was indicated. The main outcome under study was reasons for CPAP discontinuation.Results A total of 585 patients were admitted in Delafontaine hospital for COVID-19. ICU was quickly overwhelmed. Fifty-nine out of 159 (37%) patients requiring ICU care had to be referred to other hospitals. CPAP therapy was initiated in 49 patients and performed out of ICU in 41 (84%). Reasons for discontinuation of CPAP were intubation for invasive ventilation in 25 (51%) patients, improvement in 16 (33%), poor tolerance in 6 (12%) and death in 2 (4%). A decision not to intubate had been taken for the 2 patients who died while on CPAP.Conclusions Treatment with CPAP is feasible and safe in a non-ICU environment in the context of a massive influx of patients. One third of these patients with high oxygen requirements did not eventually need invasive ventilation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding required.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the national ethics review board (CNRIPH - Commission Nationale des Recherches Impliquant la Personne Humaine) under the number 2020-A01396-33. The patients or their next-of-kin were informed by mail about the data collection process and their right to oppose. The database was declared to the Commission Nationale Informatique et Libertes (CNIL) under the number 2217928.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, VI. The data are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.