PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Bernard M. Groen
AU  - Paul Turner
AU  - Peter Lacey
TI  - “The expediency of local modelling to aid national responses to SARS-CoV-2.”
AID  - 10.1101/2020.05.27.20107656
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.05.27.20107656
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/02/2020.05.27.20107656.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/02/2020.05.27.20107656.full
AB  - Background With the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic gripping most of the globe, healthcare and economic recovery strategies are being explored currently as a matter of urgency. The underpinning rationale of this paper is that we believe that health and care services are provided locally, therefore, local implications of national policy need to be reflected when informing national responses to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.Methods We adopted the assumptions underlying the United Kingdom government’s national epidemiological model which influences the national policy response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We used these in a local context and show projections in terms of presentations of symptomatic patients differ in a variety of settings. Setting: North of England, United Kingdom, population modelled at four local constituent levels which aggregated gives a total population of 3.2m.Results We clearly demonstrate that there is significant difference in the way the national modelling outputs are replicated at local levels. Specifically, in terms of projected increased levels of demand for services on the local health and care systems.Conclusions We present significant evidence of differing timelines specifically in terms of subsequent projected peak demands. Additionally, it clearly indicates varying levels of such demand throughout the four modelled localities. These idiosyncrasies are ‘masked’ by both regional and national approaches to modelling. We urge readers to ensure that any national policy is appropriately adopted through the use of complementary bottom up approach, to suit local health and care systems. Finally, we share our methodology to ensure other professionals could replicate this study elsewhere.Competing Interest StatementDr Turner discloses that he consults for NHS partners through WSP, in addition to his role at the University of Lincoln. Mr Lacey discloses that he consults for a variety of NHS organisations through WSP.Funding StatementThis research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Time and resources were made available by NHS Health Education England.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:NHS Health Education England Durham UniversityAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesFurther methodological approach details available upon request from lead author. Data is available on Harvard DataVerse, see link below. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MTK2NW