RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 SARS-CoV-2 in environmental samples of quarantined households
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.05.28.20114041
DO 10.1101/2020.05.28.20114041
A1 Manuel Döhla
A1 Gero Wilbring
A1 Bianca Schulte
A1 Beate Mareike Kümmerer
A1 Christin Diegmann
A1 Esther Sib
A1 Enrico Richter
A1 Alexandra Haag
A1 Steffen Engelhart
A1 Anna Maria Eis-Hübinger
A1 Martin Exner
A1 Hendrik Streeck
A1 Ricarda Maria Schmithausen
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/02/2020.05.28.20114041.abstract
AB The role of environmental transmission of SARS-CoV-2 remains unclear. Particularly the close contact of persons living together or cohabitating in domestic quarantine could result in high risk for exposure to the virus within the households. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the whereabouts of the virus and whether useful precautions to prevent the dissemination can be given.21 households under quarantine conditions were randomly selected for this study. All persons living in each household were recorded in terms of age, sex and time of household quarantine. Throat swabs for analysis were obtained from all adult individuals and most of the children. Air, wastewater samples and surface swabs (commodities) were obtained and analysed by RT- PCR. Positive swabs were cultivated to analyse for viral infectivity.26 of all 43 tested adults (60.47 %) tested positive by RT-PCR. All 15 air samples were PCR- negative. 10 of 66 wastewater samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 (15.15 %) as well as 4 of 119 object samples (3.36 %). No statistically significant correlation between PCR-positive environmental samples and the extent of infection spread inside the household could be observed. No infectious virus could be isolated under cell culture conditions.As we cannot rule out transmission through surfaces, hygienic behavioural measures are important in the households of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals to avoid potential transmission through surfaces. The role of the domestic environment, in particular the wastewater load in washbasins and showers, in the transmission of SARS CoV-2 should be further clarified.HighlightsWith public “shut downs” due to SARS-CoV-2, domestic infection is a main possible route of transmission.All analysed air samples were tested negative for SARS-CoV-2.15.15 % of all wastewater samples (washbasin, showers and toilets) were tested positive.Only 3.36 % of all object samples were tested positive: one remote control, two metallic door knobs and one wooden stove overlay.This study supports the hypothesis that indirect environmental transmission may only play a minor role, which needs clarifications in further studies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe personal for this work was in part funded by the BMBF (Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany) funding measure HyReKA which is part of Risk management of new pollutants and pathogens in the water cycle (RiSKWa) in the funding priority Sustainable Water Management (NaWaM) [grant number FKZ02WRS1377]. Further personal was in parts funded by the BONFOR funding programme (Instrument 2) of the Medical Faculty University of Bonn [grant number 2018-2-03]. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study complies with the ethical guidelines of the declaration of Helsinki by the world medical association from 1964 and its subsequent revisions. The ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Bonn was involved and approved the procedures and the publication of the results (reference no. 085/20).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Yesnot applicable