PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Tai, Zhang Yong AU - Goh, Robby Miguel W.J AU - Tay, Louisa AU - Zhou, Ruishu AU - Wong, Lin Ho AU - Wong, Pang Ong TI - Mixed Chinese herbs and Western medicine for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a mixed method review AID - 10.1101/2020.05.11.20098111 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.05.11.20098111 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/18/2020.05.11.20098111.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/18/2020.05.11.20098111.full AB - Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic affecting millions around the world. There is no existing pharmaceutical treatment that is known to be effective. Preliminary data shows that San Yao San Fang (SYSF) has clinical benefits in patients with COVID-19. The aim of this paper is to review existing data regarding the use of formulas within San Yao San Fang in the treatment of COVID-19Search Strategy We searched through EMBASE, Pubmed, Cochrane, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for studies on SYSF and patients with COVID-19 through April 2020.Eligibility Criteria We included studies that included a formula within San Yao San Fang with or without Western interventions against Western interventions.Main results We included 7 studies involving 532 patients. 3 retrospective observational studies and 1 randomised control trial reported on Lian Hua Qing Wen Jiao Nang, 1 randomised control trial on Jin Hua Qing Gan Ke Li, 1 retrospective observational study on Xue Bi Jing Zhu Se Ye and 1 randomised control trial on Qing Fei Pai Du Tang.SYSF combined with Western interventions improved the recovery rate of symptoms such as fever (Risk Ratio (RR) 0.40 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.66, P < 0.01)), cough (RR 0.56 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.82, P < 0.01)) and fatigue (RR 0.61 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.78, P < 0.01)) and other symptoms such as headache, gastrointestinal symptoms, myalgia, dyspnoea and chest tightness (RR 0.63 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.83, P < 0.01)) as compared to the control group.SYSF combined with Western interventions reduced the duration of fever as compared to the control group. (Mean difference (MD) -1.18 (95% CI -1.45 to -0.91, P < 0.01))In regards to adverse events, there is no statistical difference between the treatment group treated with SYSF and Western interventions and the control group. (RR 1.62 (95% CI 0.83 to 3.17, P = 0.16)).SYSF combined with Western interventions did not show to significantly reduce duration of hospitalisation as compared to the control group. (MD -0.73 (95% CI -5.19 to 3.73, P = 0.75))Conclusion SYSF appears to be clinically effective and safe. Further research is required to ensure the efficacy of SYSF.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNAAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesNA