RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Quality of Care at childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings of the IMAgiNE EURO study in Belgium
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.03.25.24304838
DO 10.1101/2024.03.25.24304838
A1 Galle, Anna
A1 D’Hauwers, Silke
A1 Berghman, Helga
A1 Vaerewijck, Nele
A1 Valente, Emanuelle Pessa
A1 Mariani, Ilaria
A1 Bomben, Arianna
A1 Vedove, Stefano delle
A1 Lazzerini, Marza
A1 ,
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/26/2024.03.25.24304838.abstract
AB Objectives To examine quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around childbirth in facilities in Belgium during the COVID-19 pandemic and trends over time.Design A cross-sectional observational study.Setting Data of the IMAgiNE EURO study in Belgium. ParticipantsWomen giving birth in a Belgian facility from March 1, 2020, to May 1, 2023, responded a validated online questionnaire based on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures organised in four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of resources, and organizational changes related to COVID-19.Primary and secondary outcome measures Quantile regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of QMNC; trends over time were tested with the Mann-Kendall test.Results 897 women were included in the analysis, 67%(n=601) with spontaneous vaginal birth, 13.3%(n=119) with instrumental vaginal birth and 19.7%(n=177) with cesarean section. We found high QMNC scores but also specific gaps in all domains of QMNC. On provision of care, 21.0%(n=166) of women who experienced labor and 14.7%(n=26) of women with a cesarean reported inadequate pain relief; 64.7%(n=74) of women with an instrumental birth reported fundal pressure and 72.3% (n=86) reported that forceps or vacuum cup was used without their consent. On experience of care, 31.1%(n=279) reported unclear communication, 32.9%(n=295) reported that they were not involved in choices,11.5%(n=104) stated not being treated with dignity and 8.1%(n=73) experienced abuse. Related to resources, almost half of the women reported an inadequate number of healthcare professionals (46.2%, n=414). The multivariable analyses showed significantly lower QMNC scores for women with an instrumental vaginal birth. Over time there was a significant increase in QMNC score for ‘experience of care’ and ‘key organizational changes due to COVID-19’.Conclusions and relevance Although overall QMNC scores were high, findings also suggest gaps in QMNC. Underlying causes of these gaps should be explored to design appropriate interventions and policies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health, through the contribution given to the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:the IRCCS Burlo Garofolo Trieste (IRB‐BURLO 05/2020 15.07.2020) and the Commision Medical Ethics UZ Ghent (THE-2023-0075)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors