RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Pneumask: Modified Full-Face Snorkel Masks as Reusable Personal Protective Equipment for Hospital Personnel
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.24.20078907
DO 10.1101/2020.04.24.20078907
A1 Kroo, Laurel
A1 Kothari, Anesta
A1 Hannebelle, Melanie
A1 Herring, George
A1 Pollina, Thibaut
A1 Chang, Ray
A1 Peralta, Dominic
A1 Banavar, Samhita P.
A1 Flaum, Eliott
A1 Soto-Montoya, Hazel
A1 Li, Hongquan
A1 Combes, Kyle
A1 Pan, Emma
A1 Vu, Khang
A1 Yen, Kelly
A1 Dale, James
A1 Kolbay, Patrick
A1 Ellgas, Simon
A1 Konte, Rebecca
A1 Hajian, Rozhin
A1 Zhong, Grace
A1 Jacobs, Noah
A1 Jain, Amit
A1 Kober, Filip
A1 Ayala, Gerry
A1 Allinne, Quentin
A1 Cucinelli, Nicholas
A1 Kasper, Dave
A1 Borroni, Luca
A1 Gerber, Patrick
A1 Venook, Ross
A1 Baek, Peter
A1 Arora, Nitin
A1 Wagner, Philip
A1 Miki, Roberto
A1 Kohn, Jocelyne
A1 Bitran, David Kohn
A1 Pearson, John
A1 Herrera, Cristián Muñiz
A1 Prakash, Manu
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/29/2020.04.24.20078907.abstract
AB Here we adapt and evaluate a full-face snorkel mask for use as personal protective equipment (PPE) for health care workers, who lack appropriate alternatives during the COVID-19 crisis in the spring of 2020. The design (referred to as Pneumask) consists of a custom snorkel-specific adapter that couples the snorkel-port of the mask to a rated filter (either a medical-grade ventilator inline filter or an industrial filter). This design has been tested for the sealing capability of the mask, filter performance, CO2 buildup and clinical usability. These tests found the Pneumask capable of forming a seal that exceeds the standards required for half-face respirators or N95 respirators. Filter testing indicates a range of options with varying performance depending on the quality of filter selected, but with typical filter performance exceeding or comparable to the N95 standard. CO2 buildup was found to be roughly equivalent to levels found in half-face elastomeric respirators in literature. Clinical usability tests indicate sufficient visibility and, while speaking is somewhat muffled, this can be addressed via amplification (Bluetooth voice relay to cell phone speakers through an app) in noisy environments. We present guidance on the assembly, usage (donning and doffing) and decontamination protocols. The benefit of the Pneumask as PPE is that it is reusable for longer periods than typical disposable N95 respirators, as the snorkel mask can withstand rigorous decontamination protocols (that are standard to regular elastomeric respirators). With the dire worldwide shortage of PPE for medical personnel, our conclusions on the performance and efficacy of Pneumask as an N95-alternative technology are cautiously optimistic.Key points Full-face snorkel masks are adapted for use as Personal Protective Equipment during the COVID-19 crisis, using a custom adapter that facilitates the attachment of inline medical-grade respiratory filters or NIOSH industrial respirator filters. This solution was designed as a reusable stopgap solution for healthcare workers to help address the short-term global N95 respirator shortage.Competing Interest StatementGerry Ayala (Wildhorn Outfitters), Quentin Allinne (Subea Decathlon), and Dave Kasper (iSnorkel Inc) have company affiliations with snorkel-mask manufacturers or distributors. They consulted on original designs of these masks, and in some cases to help with adapter design strategy. None of the scientific data included in this report, nor the conclusions of this report were written or substantially influenced by these co-authors. John Pearson, MD has a conflict of interest, as a stake holder in a for-profit entity focused on snorkel-based PPE. Patrick Kolbay is volunteering his time at this company. We certify that none of the other authors have any affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. None of the other authors (beyond what is listed above) have any affiliations with John Pearson's company.Funding StatementWe thank Schmidt Futures, Moore Foundation, Autodesk and CZ BioHub for financial support of the project.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is available in the manuscript and upon request from the authors.