RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Implementation and Adherence to Regular Asymptomatic Testing in a COVID-19 Vaccine Trial
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2024.02.28.24303505
DO 10.1101/2024.02.28.24303505
A1 Williams, Lucy R
A1 Emary, Katherine R W
A1 Phillips, Daniel J
A1 Hay, Jodie
A1 Larwood, Jessica P J
A1 Ramasamy, Maheshi N
A1 Pollard, Andrew J
A1 Grassly, Nicholas C
A1 Voysey, Merryn
YR 2024
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/29/2024.02.28.24303505.abstract
AB Background For pathogens which cause infections that present asymptomatically, evaluating vaccine efficacy (VE) against asymptomatic infection is important for understanding a vaccine’s potential epidemiological impact. Regular testing for subclinical infections is a potentially valuable strategy but its success hinges on participant adherence and minimising false positives. This paper describes the implementation and adherence to weekly testing in a COVID-19 vaccine trial.Methods COV002 was a phase 2/3 trial assessing the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Asymptomatic infections were detected using weekly self-administered swabs for RT-PCR testing. We analysed adherence using mixed-effects regression models and estimated the probability of true and false positive asymptomatic infections using estimates of adherence and testing characteristics.Findings 356,551 tests were self-administered by 10,811 participants during the 13-month follow-up. Median adherence was 75.0% (IQR 42·6-90·9), which translated to a 74·5% (IQR 50·9-78·8) probability of detecting a positive asymptomatic infection during the swabbing period, and between 21 and 96 false positives during VE evaluation. The odds of returning a swab declined by 8% per week and further after testing positive and unblinding. Adherence was higher in older age groups, females and non-healthcare workers.Interpretation The COV002 trial demonstrated the feasibility of running a long-term regular asymptomatic testing strategy. This information could be valuable for designing future phase III vaccine trials in which infection is an outcome.Funding UK Research and Innovation, National Institutes for Health Research (NIHR), Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Thames Valley and South Midland’s NIHR Clinical Research Network, AstraZeneca.Evidence before this study Regular testing for asymptomatic infections in clinical trials is useful for evaluating the role of candidate vaccines or drugs in preventing infection. While there is extensive research on loss to follow-up in clinical trials, there is minimal research on adherence to repeat clinical trial procedures. During the COVID-19 pandemic, regular asymptomatic testing was used for surveillance and contact tracing in isolated populations, and in two SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials.We searched PubMed from database inception to Dec 17, 2023 using the following search terms (title or abstract) for articles published in English: (Adherence OR Compliance OR Uptake OR Implementation) AND (Repeat test* OR regular test* OR weekly test* OR monthly test* OR serial test*) AND (“covid*” OR “COVID-19*” OR “SARS-CoV-2*” OR “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2”), and reviewed the identified publications.Identified studies demonstrated the feasibility over short time periods of regular asymptomatic testing in hospital, care home, university, school and workplace settings. A small number evaluated differences in adherence by socio-demographic characteristics, mainly highlighting increased age as a predictor of adherence. No studies evaluated adherence in clinical trial settings or predictors of adherence over time.Added value of this study We evaluated the feasibility and adherence to regular asymptomatic testing in a phase III trial of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. We demonstrated high adherence across trial participants over a year of follow-up, but significant differences across socio-demographic characteristics. Adherence was highest in older age groups, females and non-healthcare workers, and declined most strongly over time in younger age groups. We show how the frequency of testing can be translated to an estimated probability of a false positive and negative infections.Implications of all the available evidence The overall evidence suggests that regular asymptomatic testing is a feasible strategy for tracking the risk of infection for diseases with a high proportion of subclinical infections. Strategies to support subpopulations to maintain adherence over prolonged periods of time may be necessary, and consideration needs to be given to the optimal time over which this type of intensive sampling provides valuable data. Further research into the effect of variation in adherence to regular testing on vaccine efficacy estimates would be valuable.Competing Interest StatementMV, MNR, KRWE and AJP are contributors to intellectual property licensed by Oxford University Innovation to AstraZeneca. MNR has been an investigator on vaccine trials outside the scope of this manuscript that have received support from and/or have been sponsored by AstraZeneca, ILiAD Biotechnologies, GSK Vaccines for Global Health and VBI Vaccines but all funding for these projects was paid directly to the University of Oxford. AJP reports unpaid work as the Chair of UK Department of Health and Social Care's Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation and as a previous member of the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunisation (up to 2022). LRW, JPJL, NCG, JH and DJP declare no conflicts of interest.Clinical TrialNCT04400838Funding StatementThe COV002 study was funded by UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Thames Valley and South Midland's NIHR Clinical Research Network, and AstraZeneca. This report is independent research funded by the UK NIHR and UK Research and Innovation. This work was supported by payments made to the Imperial College London, MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis (reference MR/X020258/1), funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC). This UK funded award is carried out in the frame of the Global Health EDCTP3 Joint Undertaking. This work was also supported by the MRC Doctoral Training Partnership (to LRW and KRWE) and the Imperial College President's Scholarship (to LRW).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and the South-Central Berkshire Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAnonymised participant data is available upon request directed to the alternative corresponding author. Proposals will be reviewed and approved by the sponsor, investigator, and collaborators on the basis of scientific merit. After approval of a proposal, data can be shared through a secure online platform after signing a data access agreement. All data will be made available for a minimum of 5 years from the end of the trial.