PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Brima, Tufikameni
AU  - Beker, Shlomit
AU  - Prinsloo, Kevin D.
AU  - Butler, John S.
AU  - Djukic, Aleksandra
AU  - Freedman, Edward G.
AU  - Molholm, Sophie
AU  - Foxe, John J.
TI  - Probing a neural unreliability account of auditory sensory processing atypicalities in Rett Syndrome
AID  - 10.1101/2024.01.25.24301723
DP  - 2024 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2024.01.25.24301723
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/01/26/2024.01.25.24301723.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/01/26/2024.01.25.24301723.full
AB  - Background In the search for objective tools to quantify neural function in Rett Syndrome (RTT), which are crucial in the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy in clinical trials, recordings of sensory-perceptual functioning using event-related potential (ERP) approaches have emerged as potentially powerful tools. Considerable work points to highly anomalous auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) in RTT. However, an assumption of the typical signal-averaging method used to derive these measures is “stationarity” of the underlying responses – i.e. neural responses to each input are highly stereotyped. An alternate possibility is that responses to repeated stimuli are highly variable in RTT. If so, this will significantly impact the validity of assumptions about underlying neural dysfunction, and likely lead to overestimation of underlying neuropathology. To assess this possibility, analyses at the single-trial level assessing signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), inter-trial variability (ITV) and inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC) are necessary.Methods AEPs were recorded to simple 100Hz tones from 18 RTT and 27 age-matched controls (Ages: 6-22 years). We applied standard AEP averaging, as well as measures of neuronal reliability at the single-trial level (i.e. SNR, ITV, ITPC). To separate signal-carrying components from non-neural noise sources, we also applied a denoising source separation (DSS) algorithm and then repeated the reliability measures.Results Substantially increased ITV, lower SNRs, and reduced ITPC were observed in auditory responses of RTT participants, supporting a “neural unreliability” account. Application of the DSS technique made it clear that non-neural noise sources contribute to overestimation of the extent of processing deficits in RTT. Post-DSS, ITV measures were substantially reduced, so much so that pre-DSS ITV differences between RTT and TD populations were no longer detected. In the case of SNR and ITPC, DSS substantially improved these estimates in the RTT population, but robust differences between RTT and TD were still fully evident.Conclusions To accurately represent the degree of neural dysfunction in RTT using the ERP technique, a consideration of response reliability at the single-trial level is highly advised. Non-neural sources of noise lead to overestimation of the degree of pathological processing in RTT, and denoising source separation techniques during signal processing substantially ameliorate this issue.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by a grant from the U.S. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD R21 DC012447 to JJF) and with generous funding from The Rett Syndrome Research Trust. Recordings and participant phenotyping were accomplished through cores of the University of Rochester Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (UR IDDRC) which is supported by a center grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50 HD103536 to JJF) and the Rose F. Kennedy Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (RFK IDDRC), supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50 HD105352 to SM).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All aspects of the research conformed to the tenets outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, with the exception that this study was not preregistered. The institutional review boards of the University of Rochester and of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from parents or legal guardians. Where possible, informed assent from the participants was also obtained.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsAEPAuditory Evoked PotentialsANOVAAnalysis of VarianceDSSDenoising Source SeparationEEGelectroencephalogramERPEvent-Related PotentialITPCInter-trial Phase CoherenceITVInter-trial VariabilityLMELinear Mixed EffectsMMNMismatch NegativityRSSSRett Syndrome Severity ScaleRTTRett SyndromeSNRSignal to Noise RatioSOAStimulus Onset AsynchroniesTDTypically Developed