PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Norbom, Linn B. AU - Rokicki, Jaroslav AU - Eilertsen, Espen M. AU - Wiker, Thea AU - Hanson, Jamie AU - Dahl, Andreas AU - Alnæs, Dag AU - Fernández-Cabello, Sara AU - Beck, Dani AU - Agartz, Ingrid AU - Andreassen, Ole A. AU - Westlye, Lars T. AU - Tamnes, Christian K. TI - Parental education and income are linked to offspring cortical brain structure and psychopathology at 9-11 years AID - 10.1101/2023.02.16.23286027 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.02.16.23286027 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/22/2023.02.16.23286027.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/22/2023.02.16.23286027.full AB - Background A child’s socioeconomic environment can shape central aspects of their life, including vulnerability to mental disorders. Negative environmental influences in youth may interfere with the extensive and dynamic brain development occurring at this time. Indeed, there are numerous yet diverging reports of associations between parental socioeconomic status (SES) and child cortical brain morphometry. Most of these studies have used single metric- or unimodal analyses of standard cortical morphometry that downplay the probable scenario where numerous biological pathways in sum account for SES-related cortical differences in youth.Methods To comprehensively capture such variability, using data from 9758 children aged 8.9-11.1 years from the ABCD Study®, we employed linked independent component analysis (LICA) and fused vertex-wise cortical thickness, surface area, curvature and grey-/white-matter contrast (GWC). LICA revealed 70 uni- and multimodal components. We then assessed the linear relationships between parental education, parental income and each of the cortical components, controlling for age, sex, genetic ancestry, and family relatedness. We also assessed whether cortical structure moderated the negative relationships between parental SES and child general psychopathology.Results Parental education and income were both associated with larger surface area and higher GWC globally, in addition to local increases in surface area and to a lesser extent bidirectional GWC and cortical thickness patterns. The negative relation between parental income and child psychopathology were attenuated in children with a multimodal pattern of larger frontal- and smaller occipital surface area, and lower medial occipital thickness and GWC.Conclusion Structural brain MRI is sensitive to SES diversity in childhood, with GWC emerging as a particularly relevant marker together with surface area. In low-income families, having a more developed cortex across MRI metrics, appears beneficial for mental health.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Research Council of Norway (#223273, #288083, #323951, #249795, #248238, #276082, #286838, and #288083), the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (#2019069, #2021070, #2023012, #500189, #2014097, #2015044, #2015073, #2016083, #2018037, #2018076, and #2019101), KG Jebsen Stiftelsen, the ERA-Net Cofund through the ERA PerMed project IMPLEMENT, and the European Research Council under the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and Innovation program (ERC StG Grant #802998).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board at the University of California, San Diego, approved all aspects of ABCD Study. The current study was conducted in line with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK 2019/943)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll ABCD data is stored in the NIMH Data Archive Collection #2573, which is available for registered and authorised users (Request #7474, PI: Westlye). The 4.0 release will be permanently available as a persistent dataset defined in the NDA Study 1299 and has been assigned the DOI 10.15154/1523041