RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Frequency of Variants in Mendelian Alzheimer’s Disease Genes within the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP)
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.10.24.23297227
DO 10.1101/2023.10.24.23297227
A1 Dongyu Wang
A1 Alexandra Scalici
A1 Yanbing Wang
A1 Honghuang Lin
A1 Achilleas Pitsillides
A1 Nancy Heard-Costa
A1 Carlos Cruchaga
A1 Ellen Ziegemeier
A1 Joshua C. Bis
A1 Myriam Fornage
A1 Eric Boerwinkle
A1 Philip L De Jager
A1 Ellen Wijsman
A1 Josée Dupuis
A1 Alan E. Renton
A1 Sudha Seshadri
A1 Alison Goate
A1 The Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project
A1 Anita L. DeStefano
A1 Gina M. Peloso
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/25/2023.10.24.23297227.abstract
AB Objective To characterize the consequences of loss-of-function (LoF), predicted damaging missense (DM), and previously-reported clinically-relevant variants in three Mendelian Alzheimer’s disease (AD) genes – presenilin-2 (PSEN2), presenilin-1 (PSEN1), and amyloid precursor protein (APP) – within the participants from the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) whole genome sequence (WGS) and whole exome sequence (WES) data.Methods We identified rare variants (MAF <1%) previously-reported in PSEN2, PSEN1, and APP in the available ADSP sample of 14,641 individuals with WGS and 16,849 individuals with WES available for research-use (Ntotal = 31,490). We additionally curated variants in these three genes from ClinVar, OMIM, and Alzforum and report carriers of variants in clinical databases as well as LoF and predicted DM variants in these genes.Results We detected 31 previously-reported clinically-relevant variants with alternate alleles observed within the ADSP: 4 variants in PSEN2, 25 in PSEN1, and 2 in APP. Thirty-eight clinical variants with conflicting pathogenicity interpretation within ClinVar or across the databases were identified along with 12 additional LoF and 197 additional DM variants. The overall variant carrier rate for the 31 clinically-relevant variants in the ADSP was 0.3%. We observed 78 individuals carrying at least one clinically-relevant variant, 79.5% were cases compared to 3.9% controls. In those with AD, we observed that the mean age of onset of AD among carriers of these clinically-relevant variants was 19.6 ± 1.4 years earlier compared with non-carriers (p-value=7.8×10-57), and the average age of onset of AD is 5 years earlier in carriers of an additional LoF variant (n=5) compared with non-carriers.Conclusion The ADSP data permit further characterization of previously-reported AD clinically-relevant variants. A small proportion of individuals in the ADSP are carriers of a previously-reported clinically-relevant variant allele for AD and these participants have significantly earlier age of AD onset compared to non-carriers. Furthermore, we observed additional LoF variants that potentially contribute to clinical presentation of AD.Competing Interest StatementAMG has consulted for Eisai, Biogen, AbbVie, and GSK; she also serves on the Scientific Advisory Boards of Genentech and Muna Therapeutics. All other authors report no disclosures relevant to this manuscript.Funding StatementThis work was supported in part by NIA grant U01AG058589.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board(IRB) of Boston University gave ethnical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yes