RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Influence of Chinese eye exercises on myopia control in an East Asian population: a meta-analysis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 19011270
DO 10.1101/19011270
A1 Paradi Sangvatanakul
A1 Jakkree Tangthianchaichana
A1 Adis Tasanarong
A1 Noel Pabalan
A1 Phuntila Tharabenjasin
YR 2019
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/11/05/19011270.abstract
AB Objective The rates of myopia (−0.50 diopter), and high myopia (≥ −6.0 diopter) have been increasing in East Asian populations; the reasons for which may include the combinations of genetic, environment and behavioural factors. The most affected demography point to the young elite population of intellectuals produced from universities. Of the several recommendations to address the myopia epidemic, the influence of Chinese eye exercises (CEE) have been examined. However, reports have been inconsistent, prompting a meta-analysis to obtain more precise estimates.Methods Eight articles were included in the meta-analysis where we operated on the hypothesis that CEE either increased or reduced myopia control. We compared the subjects that performed CEE against those that did not. We used and estimated odds ratios [ORs] and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the generic inverse variance method. Subgroup analysis involved quality (high/serious and low/non-serious) and frequency (> 5 times/week) of performing CEE comprised. Heterogeneity was subjected to outlier treatment which split the findings into pre- (PRO) and post- (PSO) outlier. The strength of evidence in our findings were based on high significance (Pa < 10−5), surviving the Bonferroni correction and homogeneity (I2 = 0%). Outcomes with these features comprised our core findings.Results Our core findings were found in the PSO overall indicating elevated myopia control (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.86, Pa = 0.0002) and CEE subgroups (Serious: OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.84, Pa < 10−5; Frequent: OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.45-0.68, Pa < 10−5). The low quality subgroup outcome was null in PRO (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.50-1.86, Pa = 0.92) but conveyed significantly less myopia control in PSO (OR1.57, 95% CI 1.24-2.01, Pa = 0.0002).Conclusions This meta-analysis found that CEE afforded 28% greater control of myopia. Enabled by outlier treatment, this finding was homogeneous and consistent. Subgroup effects elevated myopia control to 62% when CEE was done up to 5 times a week. Improper CEE performance implied reduced myopia control of up to 57%.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis study was not registered as it is a meta-analysisFunding StatementThis study was unfundedAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAvailable upon requestAManalysis modelcccase-controlCEEChinese eye exercisesCIconfidence intervalDdiopterEHeliminated heterogeneityFfixed-effectsGSgained significanceGIVgeneric inverse varianceI2measure of variabilityIQRinterquartile rangeLoglogarithmLSlost significancemafminor allele frequencyMCmyopia controlMQJmethodological quality judgmentnnumber of studiesNOSNewcastle-Ottawa ScaleORodds ratioPaP-value for associationPbP-value for heterogeneityPRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysesPROpre-outlierPSOpost-outlierRrandom-effects[R]ReferenceRCTrandomized control trialRNSretained non-significanceRHreduced heterogeneitySDstandard deviationSEstandard errorSWShapiro-Wilkxscross-section