RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 SARS-CoV-2 variants Omicron BA.4/5 and XBB.1.5 significantly escape T cell recognition in solid organ transplant recipients vaccinated against the ancestral strain
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.08.14.23293991
DO 10.1101/2023.08.14.23293991
A1 Halvorson, Torin
A1 Ivison, Sabine
A1 Huang, Qing
A1 Ladua, Gale
A1 Yotis, Demitra M.
A1 Mannar, Dhiraj
A1 Subramaniam, Sriram
A1 Ferreira, Victor H.
A1 Kumar, Deepali
A1 Belga, Sara
A1 Levings, Megan K.
A1 ,
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/21/2023.08.14.23293991.abstract
AB Background Immune-suppressed solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) display impaired humoral responses to COVID-19 vaccination, but T cell responses are incompletely understood. The highly infectious SARS-CoV-2 variants Omicron BA.4/5 and XBB.1.5 escape neutralization by antibodies induced by vaccination or infection with earlier strains, but T cell recognition of these lineages in SOTRs is unclear.Methods We characterized Spike-specific T cell responses to ancestral SARS-CoV-2, Omicron BA.4/5 and XBB.1.5 peptides in a prospective study of kidney, lung and liver transplant recipients (n = 42) throughout a three- or four-dose ancestral Spike mRNA vaccination schedule. Using an optimized activation-induced marker assay, we quantified circulating Spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells based on antigen-stimulated expression of CD134, CD69, CD25, CD137 and/or CD107a.Results Vaccination strongly induced SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells, including BA.4/5- and XBB.1.5-reactive T cells, which remained detectable over time and further increased following a fourth dose. However, responses to Omicron BA.4/5 and XBB.1.5 were significantly lower in magnitude compared to ancestral strain responses. Antigen-specific CD4+ T cell frequencies correlated with anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibody titres, with post-second dose T cell responses predicting subsequent antibody responses. Patients receiving prednisone, lung transplant recipients and older adults displayed weaker responses.Conclusions Ancestral strain vaccination stimulates BA.4/5 and XBB.1.5-cross-reactive T cells in SOTRs, but responses to these variants are diminished. Antigen-specific T cells can predict future antibody responses and identify vaccine responses in seronegative individuals. Our data support monitoring both humoral and cellular immunity in SOTRs to track effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against emerging variants.Competing Interest StatementD.K. has received consulting fees from Roche, GSK, Exevir and clinical trials grants from GSK. S. B. has received consultant fees from AstraZeneca and GSK, honoraria from Merck and research funding from Takeda. The remaining authors have no relevant conflicts to disclose.Funding StatementThis work was supported by a grant from Public Health Agency of Canada / COVID-19 Immunity Task Force (AWD-019932 PHACA 2021) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (HUI-159423).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study of cell-mediated immunity was conducted at the University of British Columbia (UBC) with approval from the UBC Research Ethics Board (H21-01269).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors