RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Relationships between improvement in physical function, pain interference, and mental health in musculoskeletal patients
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.02.12.23285824
DO 10.1101/2023.02.12.23285824
A1 Zhang, Wei
A1 Singh, Som P
A1 Clement, Amdiel
A1 Calfee, Ryan P
A1 Bijsterbosch, Janine D
A1 Cheng, Abby L
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/02/16/2023.02.12.23285824.abstract
AB Importance Among patients seeking care for musculoskeletal conditions, there is mixed evidence regarding whether traditional, structure-based care is associated with improvement in patients’ mental health.Objective To determine whether improvements in physical function and pain interference are associated with meaningful improvements in anxiety and depression symptoms among patients seeking musculoskeletal care.Design Retrospective cohort study from June 22, 2015 to February 9, 2022.Setting Orthopedic department of a tertiary care US academic medical center.Participants Consecutive sample of adult patients who presented to the musculoskeletal clinic 4 to 6 times during the study period and completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures as standard care at each visit.Exposure PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference scores.Main Outcomes and Measures Linear mixed effects models were used to determine whether: 1) PROMIS Anxiety and 2) PROMIS Depression scores improved as a function of improved PROMIS Physical Function or Pain Interference scores, after controlling for age, gender, race, and PROMIS Depression (for the Anxiety model) and PROMIS Anxiety (for the Depression model). Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as ≥3.0 points for PROMIS Anxiety and ≥3.2 points for PROMIS Depression.Results Among 11,236 patients (mean [SD] age 57 [16] years), 9,706 (86%) were White, and 7,218 (64%) were women. Improvements in physical function (β=-0.14 [95% CI -0.15– -0.13], p<0.001) and pain interference (β=0.26 [0.25-0.26], p<0.001) were each associated with improved anxiety symptoms. To reach a clinically meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms, an improvement of ≥21 [20-23] PROMIS points on Physical Function or ≥12 [12-12] points on Pain Interference would be required. Improvements in physical function (β=-0.05 [- 0.06– -0.04], p<0.001) and pain interference (β=0.04 [0.04-0.05], p<0.001) were not associated with meaningfully improved depression symptoms.Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, substantial improvements in physical function and pain interference were required for association with any clinically meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms and were not associated with any meaningful improvement in depression symptoms. Among patients seeking musculoskeletal care, musculoskeletal clinicians and patients cannot assume that addressing physical health will result in improved symptoms of depression or potentially even sufficiently improved symptoms of anxiety.Question Among patients seeking musculoskeletal care, are improvements in physical function and pain interference associated with meaningful changes in symptoms of anxiety and depression?Findings In this large cohort study, improvement by ≥2.3 population-level standard deviations (SD) on PROMIS Physical Function or ≥1.2 SD on PROMIS Pain Interference were required for any association with meaningful improvement in anxiety symptoms. Improvements in physical function and pain interference were not associated with meaningfully improved depression symptoms.Meaning Musculoskeletal clinicians and patients cannot assume that exclusively addressing the physical aspect of a musculoskeletal condition will improve symptoms of depression or potentially even anxiety.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (grants K23AR074520 and P50MH122351) and the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board of Washington University in St. Louis gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.