RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Patient perspectives and hospital pay-for-performance: A qualitative study from Lebanon
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.01.06.23284267
DO 10.1101/2023.01.06.23284267
A1 Jade Khalife
A1 Björn Ekman
A1 Walid Ammar
A1 Fadi El-Jardali
A1 Abeer Al Halabi
A1 Elise Barakat
A1 Maria Emmelin
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/07/2023.01.06.23284267.abstract
AB Background Patient perspectives have received increasing importance within health systems over the past four decades. Measures of patient experience and satisfaction are commonly used. However, these do not capture all the information available through patient engagement. An improved understanding of the various types of patient perspectives and the distinctions between them is needed. The lack of such knowledge limits the usefulness of including patient perspectives as components within pay-for-performance initiatives. This study was aimed to identify and explore patient perspectives on hospital care in Lebanon, and to describe how they relate to the national pay-for-performance initiative.Methods We conducted a qualitative study using focus group discussions with persons recently discharged after hospitalization under the coverage of the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health. This study was implemented in 2017 and involved 42 participants across eight focus groups. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the information provided by participants.Results Five overall themes supported by 17 categories were identified, capturing the meaning of the informants’ perspectives: health is everything; being turned into second class citizens; money and ‘wasta’ (personal connections) make all the difference; wanting to be treated with dignity and respect; and tolerating letdown, for the sake of right treatment. The most frequently prioritized statement in a ranking exercise regarding patient satisfaction was regular contact with one’s doctor.Conclusions Patient perspectives include more than what is traditionally incorporated in measures of patient satisfaction and experience. Patient valuing of health and their perceptions on each of the health system, and access and quality of care should also be taken into account. Hospital pay-for-performance initiatives can be made more responsive through a broader consideration of these perspectives. More broadly, health systems would benefit from wider engagement of patients. We propose a framework relating patient perspectives to value-based healthcare and health system performance.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Wellcome Trust [204020] and a project grant [MR/N015916/1] from the Joint Health Systems Research Initiative (DFID/MRC/Wellcome Trust/ESRC) JK, WA, FJ, BE, ME. https://wellcome.org/. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The research protocol approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the American University of Beirut (ID: FHS.FE.21).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableData cannot be shared publicly, to ensure participant confidentiality. Data are available from the Institutional Review Board at the American University of Beirut (contact ID: FHS.FE.21) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.