RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 mTICI 1 vs mTICI 0 before endovascular stroke treatment in middle cerebral artery M1-occlusion – predictor for revascularization success and outcome?
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.12.21.22283688
DO 10.1101/2022.12.21.22283688
A1 Jessica Jesser
A1 Charlotte S. Weyland
A1 Arne Potreck
A1 Ulf Neuberger
A1 Michael O. Breckwoldt
A1 Min Chen
A1 Silvia Schönenberger
A1 Martin Bendszus
A1 Markus A. Möhlenbruch
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/22/2022.12.21.22283688.abstract
AB Background Endovascular stroke treatment (EST) has become the treatment of choice for middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1-segment occlusions. Little is known about the implications for revascularization success of occlusions with persisting antegrade perfusion before initiation of treatment (modified Treatment In Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI 1)) compared to a complete occlusion (mTICI 0). Here, we compared the impact of these two states of target vessel occlusion on recanalization success and clinical outcome.Methods Retrospective, single-center analysis of patients treated for M1-segment MCA occlusion with EST from 01/2015 until 05/2020 in a tertiary stroke center. Primary study endpoint was successful recanalization (mTICI 2c-3) after one thrombectomy attempt (first pass effect). Secondary endpoints were the clinical outcome (as modified Rankin Scale 90 days after stroke onset) and the complication rate. The two study groups were compared in univariate analysis including patient characteristics and procedural details.Results In this study, 422/581 patients (72.6 %) presented with complete M1-occlusion compared to 159/581 (27.4 %) with incomplete M1-occlusion. Neither did the rate of FPE differ between the study groups nor the rate of procedural complications (mTICI 0: 10 (2.4%), mTICI 1: 1 (0.6%), p = 0.304). Patients with incomplete initial occlusion showed a lower mRS at discharge (median (IQR) mTICI0: 4 (3-5) vs. mTICI1: 3 (2 – 6), p = 0.014), but a comparable mRS 90 days after stroke onset (mTICI0: 3 (2-6) vs. mTICI:1 4 (2-6), p = 0.479).Conclusion Complete M1-occlusions (mTICI 0) and incomplete occlusions (mTICI 1) show the same recanalization success and complication rate as well as a comparable clinical outcome. Thus, incomplete M1-occlusions should be treated with the same urgency as initial complete occlusions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of the medical faculty, University of Heidelberg (Germany) gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors