PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Joy M. Hutchinson AU - Kevin W. Dodd AU - Patricia M. Guenther AU - Benoit Lamarche AU - Jess Haines AU - Angela Wallace AU - Maude Perreault AU - Tabitha E. Williams AU - Maria Laura da Costa Louzada AU - Mahsa Jessri AU - Simone Lemieux AU - Dana Lee Olstad AU - Rachel Prowse AU - Janis Randall Simpson AU - Jennifer E. Vena AU - Kathleen Szajbely AU - Sharon I. Kirkpatrick TI - The Canadian Food Intake Screener for assessing alignment of adults’ dietary intake with the 2019 Canada’s Food Guide healthy food choices recommendations: Scoring system and construct validity AID - 10.1101/2022.12.19.22283575 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.12.19.22283575 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/20/2022.12.19.22283575.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/20/2022.12.19.22283575.full AB - The Canadian Food Intake Screener/Questionnaire court canadien sur les apports alimentaires was developed to rapidly assess alignment of adults’ dietary intake over the past month with the 2019 Canada Food Guide’s healthy food choices recommendations. From July to December 2021, adults (n=154) aged 18-65 years completed the screener and up to two 24-hour dietary recalls. The screener scoring system was aligned with the Healthy Eating Food Index-2019 (HEFI-2019), to the extent possible. ANOVA compared screener scores among subgroups with known differences in diet quality. Using the recall data, the National Cancer Institute multivariate method was used to model HEFI-2019 components, with the screener score as a covariate, and the correlation coefficient between screener and total HEFI-2019 scores was estimated. The mean screener score was 35 points (SD=4.7; maximum, 65), ranging from 25 (1st percentile) to 45 (99th percentile). Differences in scores in hypothesized directions were evident by gender identity (p=0.06), perceived income adequacy (p=0.07), education (p=0.02), and smoking status (p=0.003). The correlation between screener and HEFI-2019 scores was 0.53 (SE=0.12). The screener’s moderate construct validity supports its use for rapid assessment of alignment of adults’ intake with the healthy food choices recommendations when comprehensive dietary assessment is not possible.NoveltyThe Canadian Food Intake Screener was developed to rapidly assess alignment of dietary intake with Canada’s Food Guide-2019 healthy food choices recommendations.Scoring is aligned with the Healthy Eating Food Index-2019, to the extent possible.Among a sample of adults, variation in screener scores was noted, mean screener scores differed between some subgroups with known differences in diet quality, and a moderate correlation between screener scores and total Healthy Eating Food Index-2019 scores based on repeat 24-hour dietary recalls was observed.The Canadian Food Intake Screener has moderate construct validity for rapid assessment of overall alignment of adults’ dietary intake with the Canada’s Food Guide-2019 healthy food choices recommendations when comprehensive dietary assessment is not possible.Competing Interest StatementThis project was funded by and conducted in collaboration with Health Canada, through a contract to SIK. SIK has received funding from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, AI for Good, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research, Health Canada, the National Institutes of Health, the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. SIK is a member of the Health Canada Nutrition Science Advisory Committee and the CIHR Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism, and Diabetes Institute Advisory Board. SL has received funding from CIHR. BL has received funding from CIHR (ongoing), the Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Sante (FRQS) (ongoing), Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Nature et technologies (NT) (ongoing), the Ministere de la sante et des services sociaux (MSSS) du Quebec (ongoing), Health Canada (completed in 2021) and Atrium Innovations (completed in 2019). BL is a member of the Canadian Nutrition Society Advisory Board. JH has received funding from the Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research, CIHR, Danone Institute International, Danone Institute North America, Health Canada, and the National Institutes of Health. The remaining authors have no competing interests to disclose.Funding StatementThis project was funded by Health Canada, as well as an Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation Early Researcher Award held by SIK. JMH received funding from a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship and TEW received funding from a SSHRC Canada Graduate Scholarship - Master's.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University of Waterloo Research Ethics Committee (ORE #42973), the University of Guelph Research Ethics Board (REB #21-04-009), and the Health Canada and Public Health Agency of Canada Research Ethics Board (REB #2020-044H) gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available from the authors upon request.