PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Mohamed Abdulsammad AU - Fawzi Ebrahim AU - Salah Tabal AU - Sedigh Bashir AU - Ashraf Aburgiga AU - Mohamed Milad AU - Mohamed Bareem TI - SARS-CoV-2 Antibody response to the Sputnik Vaccine in previous infected Patients and non-infected one AID - 10.1101/2022.11.30.22282668 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.11.30.22282668 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/01/2022.11.30.22282668.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/01/2022.11.30.22282668.full AB - At the begging of 2020 saw the development and trials of vaccines against Covid-19 at an unprecedented pace. The first half of 2021 has seen vaccine rollout in many countries, on the other hand, Immunity to covid-19 has exhibited to minimize the risk of having a severe infection and initiate an excellent degree against the disease. This study focuses on the comparison of Anti-Spike IgG antibodies among vaccinated people with or without previous exposure to the coronavirus. To determine whether a single dose of sputnik V can produce significant antibody titer amongst previously infected cases and design vaccine dosage regimens accordingly. This study was performed at Libyan biotechnology research Centre from August 2021 to December 2021. Blood samples were collected from 1811 adult males and females vaccinated with and without a history of exposure to covid-19. Previously infected individuals’ record was noted separately. Samples were immediately analyzed by Beckman Unicel Dxl 600, Access immunoassay system. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9 Software. A P-value >0.5 was not significant. The Majority of candidates 60% of the total samples were males and on analysis, it was found that 72% of patients were seropositive, on the other hand, individuals who vaccinated and have naïve antibodies from the previous infection showed slightly higher immunological response rather than vaccinated patients without previous infection and this finding can help the policymakers to design a single-dose vaccine regimen for the former category.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/ Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was obtained from Bioethics Committee at the Biotechnology Research Center in Tripoli under letter number BEC-BTRC 8-2020.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18ozxwOwfzSu984AWimJvblniJSfrnm-7/edit#gid=1414940867 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18ozxwOwfzSu984AWimJvblniJSfrnm-7/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=115066519336643469724&rtpof=true&sd=true