RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Effect of cognitive reserve on physiological measures of cognitive workload in older adults with cognitive impairments
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.09.08.22279748
DO 10.1101/2022.09.08.22279748
A1 Devos, Hannes
A1 Gustafson, Kathleen
A1 Liao, Ke
A1 Ahmadnezhad, Pedram
A1 Kuhlmann, Emily
A1 Estes, Bradley
A1 Martin, Laura E.
A1 Mahnken, Jonathan D.
A1 Brooks, William M.
A1 Burns, Jeffrey M.
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/09/09/2022.09.08.22279748.abstract
AB Background Cognitive reserve may protect against cognitive decline. However, its effect on physiological measures of cognitive workload in adults with cognitive impairments is unclear.Objective The aim was to determine the association between cognitive reserve and physiological measures of cognitive workload in older adults with and without cognitive impairments.Methods 29 older adults with cognitive impairment (age: 75±6, 11 (38%) women, MOCA scores 20±7) and 19 with normal cognition (age: 74±6; 11 (58%) women; MOCA 28±2) completed a working memory test of increasing task demand (0-, 1-, 2-back). Cognitive workload was indexed using amplitude and latency of the P3 event-related potential (ERP) at electrode sites Fz, Cz, and Pz, and changes in pupillary size, converted to an index of cognitive activity (ICA). The Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (CRIq) evaluated Education, Work Activity, and Leisure Time as a proxy of cognitive reserve.Results Higher CRIq total scores were associated with larger P3 ERP amplitude (p=0.048), independent of cognitive status (p=0.80), task demand (p=0.003), and electrode site (p<0.0001). This relationship was mainly driven by Work Activity (p=0.0005). Higher CRIq total scores also correlated with higher mean ICA (p = 0.002), regardless of cognitive status (p=0.29) and task demand (p=0.12). Both Work Activity (p=0.0002) and Leisure Time (p=0.045) impacted ICA. No relationship was found between CRIq and P3 latency.Conclusion Cognitive reserve affects cognitive workload and neural efficiency, regardless of cognitive status. Future longitudinal studies should investigate the causal relationship between cognitive reserve and physiological processes of neural efficiency across cognitive aging.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementAcknowledgments This work was completed at the Hoglund Biomedical Imaging Center which is supported by the Forrest and Sally Hoglund and a High-End Instrumentation grant from the National Institutes of Health (S10 RR29577). The authors thank all participants for volunteering their time. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K01 K01 AG058785 and P30 AG072973. This study was supported in part by a pilot grant of the KU Alzheimer Disease Research Center (P30 AG035982). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Kansas Medical Center Institutional Revie Board (#4461)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors