RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Improving estimates of pertussis burden in Ontario, Canada 2010-2017 by combining validation and capture-recapture methodologies
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.08.05.22278478
DO 10.1101/2022.08.05.22278478
A1 Shilo H. McBurney
A1 Jeffrey C. Kwong
A1 Kevin A. Brown
A1 Frank Rudzicz
A1 Andrew Wilton
A1 Natasha S. Crowcroft
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/08/07/2022.08.05.22278478.abstract
AB An underestimation of pertussis burden has impeded understanding of transmission and disallows effective policy and prevention to be prioritized and enacted. Capture-recapture analyses can improve burden estimates; however, uncertainty remains around incorporating health administrative data due to accuracy limitations. The aim of this study is to explore the impact of pertussis case definitions and data accuracy on capture-recapture estimates. We used a dataset from March 7, 2010 to December 31, 2017 comprised of pertussis case report, laboratory, and health administrative data. We compared Chao capture-recapture abundance estimates using prevalence, incidence, and adjusted false positive case definitions. The latter was developed by removing the proportion of false positive physician billing code-only case episodes after validation. We calculated sensitivity by dividing the number of observed cases by abundance. Abundance estimates demonstrated that a high proportion of cases were missed by all sources. Under the primary analysis, the highest sensitivity of 78.5% (95% CI 76.2-80.9%) for those less than one year of age was obtained using all sources after adjusting for false positives, which dropped to 43.1% (95% CI 42.4-43.8%) for those one year of age or older. Most code-only episodes were false positives (91.0%), leading to considerably lower abundance estimates and improvements in laboratory testing and case report sensitivity using this definition. Accuracy limitations can be accounted for in capture-recapture analyses using different case definitions and adjustment. The latter enhanced the validity of estimates, furthering the utility of capture-recapture methods to epidemiological research. Findings demonstrated that all sources consistently fail to detect pertussis cases. This is differential by age, suggesting ascertainment and testing bias. Results demonstrate the value of incorporating real time health administrative data into public health surveillance if accuracy limitations can be addressed.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementSHM is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Doctoral Research Award (GSD-167037). Available from: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/193.html FR is supported by a CIFAR Chair in AI. Available from: https://cifar.ca/ai/ This study was supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). No endorsement by ICES or the Ontario MOHLTC is intended or should be inferred. Available from: https://www.ices.on.ca/ The opinions, results and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and are independent from the funding sources. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University of Toronto’s Health Sciences Research Ethics Board (# 37885) and the Public Health Ontario Ethics Review Board (# 2019-006.02) approved this study.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets from this study are held securely in coded form at ICES. While data sharing agreements with data providers prohibit ICES from making these data publicly available due to privacy concerns and risk of re-identification, access may be granted to those who meet pre-specified criteria for confidential access, available at www.ices.on.ca/DAS.