RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Daily movement behaviours and cognition in mid-life: A cross-sectional compositional analysis of the 1970 British Cohort Study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.07.06.22277309
DO 10.1101/2022.07.06.22277309
A1 JJ Mitchell
A1 JM Blodgett
A1 S Chastin
A1 BJ Jefferis
A1 G Wannamethee
A1 M Hamer
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/07/2022.07.06.22277309.abstract
AB IMPORTANCE Movement behaviours (e.g. sedentary behaviour (SB), moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA), light intensity physical activity (LIPA) and sleep) are linked to cognition, yet the relative importance of each component is unclear, and not yet explored with compositional methodologies.OBJECTIVE To examine how time spent in one behaviour (e.g. SB, MVPA, LIPA, sleep) relative to all others is associated with overall cognition, including executive function and memory.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70) is an ongoing prospective birth cohort study of adults born in England, Scotland and Wales in a single week. At age 46, participants wore an accelerometer device and completed cognitive screening. Linear regression was used to examine cross-sectional associations between movement behaviours and cognitive scores, using a compositional approach. Isotemporal substitution was performed to model the effect of reallocating time between components of daily movement on cognition.EXPOSURES A thigh-mounted activPAL accelerometer device was worn without removal for one week. Daily time in SB, MVPA, LIPA and sleep were derived using a validated processing algorithm.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Standardised scores of executive function (letter cancellation and verbal fluency), memory (immediate and delayed wordlist recall) and a composite score were derived from computer administered cognitive tasks.RESULTS The sample comprised 4,481 participants (52% female). Time in MVPA relative to SB, LIPA and sleep was positively associated with cognition after adjustments for education and occupational physical activity, but additional adjustment for health status attenuated associations. SB relative to all other movements was robustly positively associated with cognition. Modelling time reallocation between components revealed a higher cognition percentile after MVPA theoretically replaced just 9 minutes of SB (+1.31; 95% CI: 0.09, 2.50), 7 minutes of LIPA (+1.27; 0.07, 2.46) or 7 minutes of sleep (+1.20; 0.01, 2.39).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Relative to time spent in other behaviours, more time spent in MVPA and SB was associated with higher cognitive scores. Displacement of MVPA time, given its smaller relative amount, appear most deleterious. Efforts should be made to preserve MVPA time, or reinforce it with time taken from other behaviours.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by a British Heart Foundation grant (SP/15/6/31397). JJM is funded by MRC grant (MR/N013867/1). JMB is supported through a British Heart Foundation grant SP/F/20/150002.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study has been approved by NRES Committee South East Coast - Brighton & Sussex (Ref 15/LO/1446).). All participants provided ongoing informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesOriginal study protocol and survey documents can be found online at: https://bcs70.info/ and access to this data is available through the UK data service.