PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - C Wanyama AU - C Blacklock AU - J Jepkosgei AU - M English AU - L Hinton AU - J McKnight AU - S Molyneux AU - M Boga AU - P Musitia AU - G Wong TI - Protocol for the Pathways Study: a realist evaluation of staff social ties and communication in the delivery of neonatal care in Kenya AID - 10.1101/2022.06.27.22276975 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2022.06.27.22276975 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/28/2022.06.27.22276975.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/28/2022.06.27.22276975.full AB - Introduction Initiatives to improve the quality of neonatal care in low- and middle-income countries are vital to meet the Sustainable Development Goal 3 of reducing to at most 12 neonatal deaths per 1,000 by the year 2030. These initiatives have included enhancing human resources for health (HRH), and post-basic neonatal nurse training. However, the informal social ties that health workers form with colleagues and how these influence application of learned knowledge and skills and individual and group behaviours and norms in the workplace, have remained neglected in health systems research.This study seeks to better understand these relational components in Kenyan neonatal care, and how such understanding might improve design and implementation of quality improvement interventions targeting health workers’ behaviours. The Pathways Study is a realist evaluation which will develop theory for guiding quality improvement interventions.Methods and analysis We will collect data in two phases. Phase One will be a case study of 2 large urban public hospitals in Kenya, where we will conduct: non-participant observation of hospital staff during patient care and hospital meetings, a social network questionnaire with staff, in-depth interviews, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions. Data will be collected purposively and analysed using a realist logic of analysis, with interim analyses including thematic analysis of qualitative data and quantitative analysis of social network metrics.Phase Two will be a stakeholder workshop in which findings from Phase One are presented, discussed and theory refined. Recommendations for theory-informed interventions will be developed, to enhance quality improvement efforts in Kenyan hospitals.Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval for the Pathways Study has been received from Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI/SERU/CGMR-C/241/4374) and Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OxTREC 519-22). Findings will be shared with the two study hospitals, relevant educational institutions, KEMRI-WELLCOME Trust Research Programme and the University of Oxford. Study findings will also be disseminated in seminars, local and international conferences, and as academic theses and research articles published in open access scientific journals.StrengthsRealist evaluation will enable development of programme theory, which will be useful for informing the practical design and implementation of quality improvement interventions in neonatal units.The Pathways Study is the first to use social network analysis to explore the influence of staff social ties on the delivery and quality of neonatal care in Kenya.LimitationsRelational ties and other aspects of health systems ‘software’ are notoriously difficult to capture and measure in health systems research.The Pathways Study uses a mixed methods approach to collect diverse data, but it is possible that some relevant data may still not be captured. The research team will mitigate this risk by using an iterative and exploratory approach to data collection and analysis, seeking triangulation of emergent findings, promoting reflexivity of the research team, and sense-checking emergent findings with relevant stakeholders, whilst at the same time comparing with substantive sociological theory.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe work will be supported in part by Wellcome Trust (#207522) through an award to Mike English as a Senior Fellowship. Claire Blacklock is studying for a DPhil - this work is supported by the Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford and the Medical Research Council [grant number MR/N013468/1].Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Scientific and Ethics Review Unit of Kenya Medical Research Institute (REF 241/4379) and University of Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (REF 519-22) gave ethical approval for this workI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors