RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 An Economic Evaluation of a virtual Covid Ward in Leicester, Leicestershire, and Rutland
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.06.27.22276736
DO 10.1101/2022.06.27.22276736
A1 Jim Swift
A1 Noel O’Kelly
A1 Chris Barker
A1 Alex Woodward
A1 Sudip Ghosh
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/27/2022.06.27.22276736.abstract
AB Objective The objective of this study was to demonstrate the impact of a virtual Covid—19 ward on NHS resource use.Methods Different methods were used to derive comparators for the observational data on acute length of stay versus the actual lengths of stay of 310 patients on acute wards and differences estimated. The resource use associated with delivering care in the virtual ward were collected on an ongoing basis.Results The virtual ward delivered estimated health care system savings of 1,103 bed days, £529,719 in net financial savings across two key groups of patients; those who had been on oxygen and required weaning off it while within the virtual ward and those not requiring oxygen therapy with less severe acute Covid disease. The costs of the intervention were 9.7% of the estimated gross savings and the mean net saving per patient was £1,709 in the base case without including the savings associated with a likely reduction in re-admissions. The 30-day re-admission rate was 2.9%, which was substantially beneath alternative comparative data. The mean cost of the intervention was £184.38 per patient.Conclusion The virtual ward delivered significant financial savings in both groups of patients, did so with a high degree of confidence, whilst doing so at a very low absolute and relative cost.Competing Interest StatementJim Swift, Noel OKelly and Chris Barker work for Spirit Health, the manufacturers of CliniTouch Vie the digital tool used in the intervention. Professor Sudip Ghosh has no competing interests.Funding StatementNHS Leicester City CCG, NHS East Leicestershire and Rutland CCG, NHS West Leicestershire CCG and Ageing Well funded the intervention.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was evaluated by the Institutional Ethics Review body of DeMontfort University and approval was waived for the protocol.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors