RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Algorithmic Fairness and Bias Mitigation for Clinical Machine Learning: A New Utility for Deep Reinforcement Learning
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.06.24.22276853
DO 10.1101/2022.06.24.22276853
A1 Jenny Yang
A1 Andrew A. S. Soltan
A1 David A. Clifton
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/06/27/2022.06.24.22276853.abstract
AB As machine learning-based models continue to be developed for healthcare applications, greater effort is needed in ensuring that these technologies do not reflect or exacerbate any unwanted or discriminatory biases that may be present in the data. In this study, we introduce a reinforcement learning framework capable of mitigating biases that may have been acquired during data collection. In particular, we evaluated our model for the task of rapidly predicting COVID-19 for patients presenting to hospital emergency departments, and aimed to mitigate any site-specific (hospital) and ethnicity-based biases present in the data. Using a specialized reward function and training procedure, we show that our method achieves clinically-effective screening performances, while significantly improving outcome fairness compared to current benchmarks and state-of-the-art machine learning methods. We performed external validation across three independent hospitals, and additionally tested our method on a patient ICU discharge status task, demonstrating model generalizability.Competing Interest StatementDAC reports personal fees from Oxford University Innovation, personal fees from BioBeats, personal fees from Sensyne Health, outside the submitted work. No other authors report any conflicts of interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Wellcome Trust/University of Oxford Medical & Life Sciences Translational Fund (Award: 0009350) and the Oxford National Institute of Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Campus (BRC). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript. JY is a Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellow, under the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement: 955681, MOIRA). AAS is an NIHR Academic Clinical Fellow (Award: ACF-2020-13-015). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, NIHR, EU Commission, or the Wellcome Trust.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) approval via the national oversight/regulatory body, the Health Research Authority (HRA), has been granted for development and validation of artificial intelligence models to detect Covid-19 (CURIAL; NHS HRA IRAS ID: 281832). The eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) is a publicly-available, anonymized database with pre-existing institutional review board (IRB) approval. The database is released under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) safe harbor provision. The re-identification risk was certified as meeting safe harbor standards by Privacert (Cambridge, MA) (HIPAA Certification no. 1031219-2).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData from OUH studied here are available from the Infections in Oxfordshire Research Database, subject to an application meeting the ethical and governance requirements of the Database. Data from UHB, PUH and BH are available on reasonable request to the respective trusts, subject to HRA requirements. The eICU Collaborative Research Database is available online. Code and supplementary information for this paper are available online alongside publication.