RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A systematic review of ontology-based clinical decision support system rules: usage, management, and interoperability
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.05.11.22274984
DO 10.1101/2022.05.11.22274984
A1 Jing, Xia
A1 Min, Hua
A1 Gong, Yang
A1 Sittig, Dean F.
A1 Biondich, Paul
A1 Robinson, David
A1 Law, Tim
A1 Wright, Adam
A1 Nøhr, Christian
A1 Faxvaag, Arild
A1 Rennert, Lior
A1 Hubig, Nina
A1 Gimbel, Ronald
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/05/16/2022.05.11.22274984.abstract
AB Objective Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have a critical role in improving the quality and safety of health care delivery. CDSS rules direct the behavior of CDSS. However, the CDSS rules have not been routinely shared and reused, and ontology can promote the reusing of CDSS rules. We systematically screened literature to elaborate on the current status of ontology applied in CDSS rule management.Methods We searched PubMed, the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, and the Nursing & Allied Health Database for publications focusing on ontology, clinical decision support, and rules. Grounded theory and PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed. One author started the screening and literature analysis, and two authors validated the processes and results. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed and refined iteratively.Results Among 81 included publications, the identified CDSS were mainly applied to managing chronic conditions, alerts for medication prescriptions, reminders for immunizations and preventive services, diagnoses, and treatment recommendations. The CDSS rules were presented in Semantic Web Rule Language, Jess, or Jena formats. Despite ontology was used to supply medical knowledge, CDSS rules, and terminologies to CDSS, ontology has not been used in CDSS rule management.Conclusions Although ontology can facilitate the reuse, management, and maintenance of CDSS rules, CDSS ontology remains unavailable indicating that more efforts are needed to improve the reusability and interoperability of CDSS rules.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work is supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award No. R01GM138589 and partially under P20 GM121342. We thank Professor James Cimino for his valuable feedback and suggestions on the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors