RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A simple algorithm based on initial Ct values predicts the duration to SARS-CoV-2 negativity and allows more efficient test-to-release and return-to-work schedules
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.04.04.22273384
DO 10.1101/2022.04.04.22273384
A1 Anastasiou, Olympia E.
A1 Khanh Le-Trilling, Vu Thuy
A1 Trilling, Mirko
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/04/2022.04.04.22273384.abstract
AB Especially during global pandemics but also in the context of epidemic waves, the capacity for diagnostic qRT-PCRs rapidly becomes a limiting factor. Furthermore, excessive testing incurs high costs and can result in an overstrained work force in diagnostics departments. Obviously, people aim to shorten their isolation periods, hospitals need to discharge convalescent people, and re-employ staff members after infection. The aim of the study was to optimize retesting regimens for test-to-release from isolation and return-to-work applications. For this purpose, we investigated the association between Ct values at the first diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the period until test negativity was reached, or at least until the Ct value exceeded 30, which is considered to indicate the transition to a non-infectious state. We included results from the testing of respiratory material samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, tested from 01 March 2020 to 31 January 2022.Lower initial Ct values were associated with longer periods of SARS-CoV-2 RNA positivity. Starting with Ct values of <20, 20-25, 25-30, 30-35, and >35, it took median intervals of 20 (interval: 14-25), 16 (interval: 10-21), 12 (interval: 7-16), 7 (interval: 5-14), and 5 (interval: 2-7) days, respectively, until the person tested negative. Accordingly, a Ct threshold of 30 was surpassed after 13 (interval: 8-19), 9 (interval: 6-14), 7 (interval: 6-11), 6 (interval: 4-10), and 3 (interval: 1-6) days, respectively, in individuals with aforementioned start Ct values. Furthermore, the time to negativity was longer for adults versus children, wild-type SARS-CoV-2 variant versus other variants of concern, and in patients who were treated in the intensive care units.Based on these data, we propose an adjusted retesting strategy according to the initial Ct value in order to optimize available PCR resources.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any external fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The ethics committee of the medical faculty of the University of Duisburg-Essen approved the analysis of data for the improvement of diagnostic procedures.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAdditional aggregated data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors