PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Unkels, Regine
AU  - Manzi, Fatuma
AU  - Kapologwe, Ntuli A.
AU  - Baker, Ulrika
AU  - Ahmad, Aziz
AU  - Nabiev, Rustam
AU  - Berndtsson, Maria
AU  - Baraka, Jitihada
AU  - Hanson, Claudia
AU  - Hirose, Atsumi
TI  - Feasibility, usability and acceptability of a novel digital hybrid-system for reporting of routine health information in Southern Tanzania: A mixed-methods study
AID  - 10.1101/2022.02.07.22270225
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2022.02.07.22270225
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/08/2022.02.07.22270225.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/08/2022.02.07.22270225.full
AB  - Background Health information systems are important for health planning and monitoring of progress. Still, data from health facilities are often of limited quality in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries. Quality deficits are partially rooted in the fact that paper-based documentation is still the norm at facility level, leading to mistakes in summarizing and manual copying. Digitalization of data at facility level would allow automatization of these procedural steps. Here we aimed to evaluate the feasibility, usability and acceptability of a scanning innovation called Smart Paper Technology for digital data processing.Methods We used a mixed-methods design to understand users’ engagement with Smart Paper Technology and to identify potential positive and negative effects of this innovation in three health facilities in Southern Tanzania. Eight focus group discussions and 11 in-depth interviews with users were conducted. We quantified time used by health care providers for documentation and patient care using time-motion methods. Thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data. Descriptive statistics and multivariable linear models were generated to compare the difference before and after introduction and adjust for confounders.Results Health care providers and health care managers appreciated the forms’ simple design features and perceived Smart Paper Technology as time-saving and easy to use. The time-motion study with 273.3 and 224.0 hours of observations before and after introduction of Smart Paper Technology, respectively, confirmed that working time spent on documentation did not increase (27.0% at baseline and 26.4% post-introduction; adjusted p=0.763). Time spent on patient care was not negatively impacted (26.9% at baseline and 37.1% at post-intervention; adjusted p=0.001). Health care providers described positive effects on their accountability for data and service provision relating to the fact that individually signed forms were filled.Discussion Health care providers perceived Smart Paper Technology as feasible, easy to integrate and acceptable in their setting, particularly as it did not add time to documentation.Competing Interest StatementFinancial Statement The research project received funding from Swedish Research Council (Grant number 2017 05572, PI Atsumi Hirose).The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Conflict of Interest Rustam Nabiev is co-founder and board member of SHIFO and was involved in development and promotion of the smart paper technology described in this manuscript. Funding StatementThe research project received funding from Swedish Research Council (Grant number 2017- 05572, PI Atsumi Hirose)The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:We received ethical clearance from the Institutional Ethical Committee of Ifakara Health Institute (IHI/RB/No.20 -2018) and National Institute of Medical Research (NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol.IX/3018) in Tanzania and from the Ethics Review Board of the Commune of Stockholm (2019-04022 Gk), Sweden.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll quantitative data are contained in the manuscript or supplementary material. No raw data for the qualitative study part will be made available because it relates to a small, specific participants group in three health facilities in one district in Tanzania. Making the full data set publicly available could potentially breach the privacy that was promised to participants when they agreed to take part and the ethics approval granted from the National Institute for Medical Research in Tanzania and the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. Therefore, the authors will not make the full transcripts available to a wider audience. However, a summary table of codes, categories and themes is provided in the supplementary material.DHIS2District Health Information System 2FGDFocus Group DiscussionsIDIIn-depth InterviewsHCPHealth Care ProviderHMISHealth Information Management SystemPRISMPerformance of Routine Health Information Systems ManagementSPTSmart Paper Technology