PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Kpokiri, Eneyi E.
AU  - Sri-Pathmanathan, Clarisse
AU  - Shrestha, Priyanka
AU  - Navaid, Sana
AU  - Wiwatpanit, Teerawat
AU  - Wijegunawardana, Asha
AU  - Umar, Mahmud Ali
AU  - Jackson, Debra
AU  - Alger, Jackeline
AU  - Bohren, Meghan A.
AU  - Hoole, Mia
AU  - Labarda, Meredith
AU  - Juban, Noel
AU  - Launois, Pascal
AU  - Tang, Weiming
AU  - Halpaap, Beatrice
AU  - Tucker, Joseph D.
TI  - Crowdfunding for health research: A global systematic review, qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot for LMIC researchers
AID  - 10.1101/2021.11.08.21266070
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.11.08.21266070
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/01/2021.11.08.21266070.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/02/01/2021.11.08.21266070.full
AB  - Background Many low-and middle-income country (LMIC) researchers have disadvantages when applying for research grants. Crowdfunding may help LMIC researchers to fund their research. Crowdfunding organizes large groups of people to make small contributions to support a research study. This manuscript synthesizes global qualitative evidence and describes a TDR crowdfunding pilot for LMIC-based researchers.Methods Our global systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis searched six databases for qualitative data. We used a thematic synthesis approach and assessed our findings using the GRADE-CERQual approach. Building on the review findings, we organized a crowdfunding pilot to support LMIC researchers and use crowdfunding. The pilot provided an opportunity to assess the feasibility of crowdfunding for infectious diseases of poverty research in resource-constrained settings.Results Nine studies were included in the qualitative evidence synthesis and we identified seven themes. Seven studies demonstrated that strong public engagement facilitated crowdfunding for research. Other themes included the correlates of crowdfunding success, risks of crowdfunding, and risk mitigation strategies. Our pilot data suggest that crowdfunding is feasible in diverse LMIC settings. Three researchers launched crowdfunding campaigns, met their goals and received substantial monetary (raising a total of $26,546 across all five campaigns) and non-monetary contributions. Two researchers are still preparing for campaign launch due to COVID-19 related difficulties.Conclusion Public engagement provides a foundation for effective crowdfunding for health research. Our evidence synthesis and pilot data provide practical strategies for LMIC researchers to engage the public and use crowdfunding. A practical guide was created alongside to facilitate these activities across multiple settings.What is already known?Crowdfunding has been used to fund health causes, technology start-ups, creative projects, and more recently, scientific research. Although crowdfunding has been used for research funding in high-income settings, there is less evidence from LMIC settings. In addition, previous reviews of crowdfunding have not focused on public engagement strategies that may be important for developing effective crowdfunding campaigns.What are the new findings?- Our qualitative evidence synthesis finds that crowdfunding research focuses on creators and backers in high-income settings, neglecting LMIC researchers.- The TDR pilot programme suggests that crowdfunding is feasible for LMIC researchers. Three of the five pilot finalists exceeded their crowdfunding goals and received substantial non-monetary contributions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe work received support from the TDR, the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, co-sponsored by UNICEF, UNDP, the World Bank and WHO. TDR is able to conduct its work, thanks to the commitment and support from a variety of funders. These include our long-term core contributors from national governments and international institutions, as well as designated funding for specific projects within our current priorities. TDR receives additional funding from Sida, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, to support SIHIAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors