PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Nikos I. Bosse
AU  - Sam Abbott
AU  - Johannes Bracher
AU  - Habakuk Hain
AU  - Billy J. Quilty
AU  - Mark Jit
AU  - Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases COVID-19 Working Group
AU  - Edwin van Leeuwen
AU  - Anne Cori
AU  - Sebastian Funk
TI  - Comparing human and model-based forecasts of COVID-19 in Germany and Poland
AID  - 10.1101/2021.12.01.21266598
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.12.01.21266598
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/05/2021.12.01.21266598.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/05/2021.12.01.21266598.full
AB  - Forecasts based on epidemiological modelling have played an important role in shaping public policy throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. This modelling combines knowledge about infectious disease dynamics with the subjective opinion of the researcher who develops and refines the model and often also adjusts model outputs. Developing a forecast model is difficult, resource- and time-consuming. It is therefore worth asking what modelling is able to add beyond the subjective opinion of the researcher alone. To investigate this, we analysed different real-time forecasts of cases of and deaths from COVID-19 in Germany and Poland over a 1-4 week horizon submitted to the German and Polish Forecast Hub. We compared crowd forecasts elicited from researchers and volunteers, against a) forecasts from two semi-mechanistic models based on common epidemiological assumptions and b) the ensemble of all other models submitted to the Forecast Hub. We found crowd forecasts, despite being overconfident, to outperform all other methods across all forecast horizons when forecasting cases (weighted interval score relative to the Hub ensemble 2 weeks ahead: 0.89). Forecasts based on computational models performed comparably better when predicting deaths (rel. WIS 1.26), suggesting that epidemiological modelling and human judgement can complement each other in important ways.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNIB received funding from the Health Protection Research Unit (grant code NIHR200908). SA's work was funded by the Wellcome Trust (grant: 210758/Z/18/Z). The work of JB was supported by the Helmholtz Foundation via the SIMCARD Information and Data Science Pilot Project. This research was partly funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (16/137/109 & 16/136/46) using UK aid from the UK Government to support global health research. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the UK Department of Health and Social Care. BJQ is supported in part by a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1139859). EvL acknowledges funding by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Modelling and Health Economics (grant number NIHR200908) and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme - project EpiPose (101003688). AC acknowledges funding by the NIHR, the Sergei Brin foundation, USAID, and the Academy of Medical Sciences. SF's work was supported by the Wellcome Trust (grant: 210758/Z/18/Z), and the NIHR (NIHR200908).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Data for this study are publicly available on https://github.com/epiforecasts/covid.german.forecasts/ and are also included in the covid.german.forecassts R package associated with the repository. Data files related to human input can be found here: https://github.com/epiforecasts/covid.german.forecasts/tree/master/crowd-forecast/processed-forecast-data. This study has been approved by the Observational / Interventions Research Ethics Committee at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. The relevant documents can be found here: https://github.com/epiforecasts/covid.german.forecasts/tree/master/ethics.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online at https://github.com/epiforecasts/covid.german.forecasts