RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A new fMRI localizer for preoperative language mapping using a sentence completion task: Validity, choice of baseline condition, and test-retest reliability
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.10.17.21264884
DO 10.1101/2021.10.17.21264884
A1 Elin, Kirill
A1 Malyutina, Svetlana
A1 Bronov, Oleg
A1 Stupina, Ekaterina
A1 Marinets, Aleksei
A1 Dragoy, Olga
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/18/2021.10.17.21264884.abstract
AB To avoid post-neurosurgical language deficits, intraoperative mapping of the language function in the brain can be complemented with preoperative mapping with fMRI. The validity of an fMRI ‘language localizer’ paradigm crucially depends on the choice of an optimal language task and baseline condition. This study presents a new fMRI ‘language localizer’ in Russian using overt sentence completion, a task that comprehensively engages the language function by involving both production and comprehension at the word and sentence level. The paradigm was validated in 18 neurologically healthy volunteers who participated in two scanning sessions, for estimating test-retest reliability. For the first time, two baseline conditions for the sentence completion task were compared.At the group level, the paradigm significantly activated both anterior and posterior language-related regions. Individual-level analysis showed that activation was elicited most consistently in the inferior frontal regions, followed by posterior temporal regions and the angular gyrus. Test-retest reliability of activation location, as measured by Dice coefficients, was moderate and thus comparable to previous studies. Test-retest reliability was higher in the frontal than temporo-parietal region and with the most liberal statistical thresholding compared to two more conservative thresholding methods. Lateralization indices were expectedly left-hemispheric, with greater lateralization in the frontal than temporo-parietal region, and showed moderate test-retest reliability. Finally, the pseudoword baseline elicited more extensive and more reliable activation, although the syllable baseline appears more feasible for future clinical use.Overall, the study demonstrated the validity and reliability of the sentence completion task for mapping the language function in the brain. The paradigm needs further validation in a clinical sample of neurosurgical patients. Additionally, the study contributes to general evidence on test-retest reliability of fMRICompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe research was supported by the Center for Language and Brain NRU Higher School of Economics, RF Government grant, ag. No. 14.641.31.0004.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The HSE Committee on Interuniversity Surveys and Ethical Assessment of Empirical Research gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.