PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Lorna R Henderson
AU  - Rinita Dam
AU  - Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah
AU  - Pavel V Ovseiko
AU  - Vasiliki Kiparoglou
TI  - Perceptions of gender equity and markers of achievement in a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC): A qualitative study
AID  - 10.1101/2021.07.29.21261318
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.07.29.21261318
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/31/2021.07.29.21261318.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/31/2021.07.29.21261318.full
AB  - Background The need to improve gender equity (GE) in academic medicine is well documented. Biomedical Research Centres (BRCs), partnerships between leading National Health Service (NHS) organisations and universities in England, conduct world-class translational research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). In 2011, eligibility for BRC funding was restricted to universities demonstrating sustained GE success recognised by the Athena SWAN Charter for Women in Science Silver awards. Despite this structural change, GE research in BRC settings is underdeveloped, yet critical to the acceleration of women’s advancement and leadership.Objectives To explore both women’s and men’s perceptions of GE and current markers of achievement in a BRC setting.Methods Thematic analysis of data from two discrete research projects: 53 GE survey respondents’ free text comments (34 women, 16 men), and 16 semi structured interviews with women affiliated to the NIHR Oxford BRC.Results Four major themes emerged from the analysis: perceptions of the Athena Swan Charter for Women in Science (GE policy); views on monitoring GE in BRCs; views on current markers of achievement in academia and GE; and recommendations for actions to improve GE in BRC settings. Monitoring of GE in BRCs was deemed to be important, but complex. Participants felt current markers of achievement were not equitable to women as they did not take contextual factors into account such as maternity leave and caring responsibilities. BRC specific organisational policies and metrics are required to monitor and catalyse GE.Conclusions Markers of achievement for monitoring GE in BRCs should take into account contextual factors specific to BRCs and women’s career progression and professional advancement. GE markers of achievement should be complimented with broader aspects of equality, diversity and inclusion. Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding The research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), grant BRC-1215-20008 to the Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust and the University of Oxford, and by the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 709517. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics statement The study was reviewed by the Officer of the Oxford University Medical Sciences Inter-divisional Research Ethics Committee and the University of Oxford Clinical Trials and Research Governance Team who determined that the study was exempt from full ethical review. All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesCopy of questionnaire available on request