PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Sarah L. Cowan AU - Martin Wiegand AU - Jacobus Preller AU - Robert J. B. Goudie TI - Validation of the 4C Deterioration Model for COVID-19 in a UK teaching hospital during Wave 2 AID - 10.1101/2021.06.22.21259331 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.06.22.21259331 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/24/2021.06.22.21259331.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/24/2021.06.22.21259331.full AB - The 4C Deterioration model was developed and validated on data collected in UK hospitals until August 26, 2020, but has not yet been validated in the presence of SARS-CoV-2 variants and novel treatment regimens that have emerged subsequently. In this first validation study of the 4C Deterioration model on patients admitted between August 27, 2020 and April 16, 2021 we found, despite a slightly overestimation of risk, that the discrimination (area under the curve 0.75, 95% CI 0.71-0.78) and calibration of the model remained consistent with the development study, strengthening the evidence for adopting this model into clinical practice.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementMartin Wiegand was funded by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014). Robert J. B. Goudie was funded by the UKRI Medical Research Council [programme code MC_UU_00002/2] and supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014). The Clinical Informatics data extraction was funded by the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre and conducted by Vince Taylor. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by a UK Health Research Authority ethics committee (20/WM/0125). Patient consent was waived because the de-identified data presented here were collected during routine clinical practice; there was no requirement for informed consent. All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe de-identified data that support the findings of this study are available from Cambridge University Hospitals but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request with permission of Cambridge University Hospitals.