PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Nicholas Stewart
AU  - Peter Smittenaar
AU  - Staci Sutermaster
AU  - Lindsay Coome
AU  - Sema Sgaier
TI  - Inequities among vulnerable communities during the COVID-19 vaccine rollout
AID  - 10.1101/2021.06.15.21258978
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.06.15.21258978
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/18/2021.06.15.21258978.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/18/2021.06.15.21258978.full
AB  - Importance Federal and state governments sought to prioritize vulnerable communities in the vaccine rollout through various methods of prioritization, and it is necessary to understand whether inequities exist.Objective To assess whether vulnerable counties have achieved similar rates of coverage to non-vulnerable areas, and how vaccine acceptance varies by vulnerability.Design, Setting, and Participants We use population-weighted univariate linear regressions to associate the COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index (CCVI) and its 7 constituent themes with a county-level time series of vaccine coverage and vaccine acceptance. We fit a multilevel model to understand how vulnerability within and across states associates with coverage as of May 8, 2021.Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s) The COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index was used as a metric for county-level vulnerability. County-level daily COVID-19 vaccination data on both first doses administered and people fully vaccinated from April 3, 2021 through May 8, 2021 were extracted from the Covid Act Now API. County-level daily COVID-19 vaccine acceptance survey data from January 6, 2021 through May 4, 2021 were obtained via the Carnegie Mellon University Delphi Group’s COVIDcast API.Results Vulnerable counties have consistently lagged less vulnerable counties. As of May 8, the top third of vulnerable counties in the US had fully vaccinated 11.3% fewer people than the bottom third (30.7% vs 34.6% of adult population; linear regression, p= 2.2e-16), and 12.1% fewer initiated vaccinations (40.1% vs 45.6%; linear regression, p= 2.2e-16)). Six out of seven dimensions of vulnerability, including Healthcare System Factors and Socioeconomic Status, predicted lower coverage whereas the Population Density theme associated with higher coverage. Vulnerable counties have also consistently had a slightly lower level of vaccine acceptance, though as of May 4, 2021 this difference was observed to be only 0.7% between low- and high-vulnerability counties (high: 86.1%, low: 85.5%, p=0.027).Conclusions and Relevance The vaccination gap between vulnerable and non-vulnerable counties is substantial and not readily explained by a difference in acceptance. Vulnerable populations continue to need additional support, and targeted interventions are necessary to achieve similar coverage in vulnerable counties compared to those less vulnerable to COVID-19.Question Are the US counties most vulnerable to COVID-19 also facing the lowest vaccination coverage?Findings US populations with increased health, social, and economic vulnerabilities have experienced consistently lower vaccination coverage. As of May 8, on average, the top third of vulnerable counties across the US had fully vaccinated 11.3% fewer people than the least vulnerable third. There is only a 0.7% difference in vaccine acceptance between the 2 cohorts..Meaning The gap in vaccination coverage among vulnerable US communities cannot be explained by lower acceptance. Structural barriers need to be addressed to decrease these inequities.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:No IRB/oversight body was required for this work.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data are available in a public, open access repository. The COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index and an interactive data explorer are available at the Surgo Venture website. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. The county-level vaccination rates are available through the Covid Act Now public API. The county-level vaccine acceptance data is available through the COVIDcast public API. https://precisionforcovid.org/ccvi https://covidactnow.org/data-api https://delphi.cmu.edu/covidcast/indicator/?date=20210604&sensor=fb-survey-smoothed_covid_vaccinated_or_accept