PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Niklas Bobrovitz
AU  - Rahul Krishan Arora
AU  - Christian Cao
AU  - Emily Boucher
AU  - Michael Liu
AU  - Claire Donnici
AU  - Mercedes Yanes-Lane
AU  - Mairead Whelan
AU  - Sara Perlman-Arrow
AU  - Judy Chen
AU  - Hannah Rahim
AU  - Natasha Ilincic
AU  - Mitchell Segal
AU  - Nathan Duarte
AU  - Jordan Van Wyk
AU  - Tingting Yan
AU  - Austin Atmaja
AU  - Simona Rocco
AU  - Abel Joseph
AU  - Lucas Penny
AU  - David A. Clifton
AU  - Tyler Williamson
AU  - Cedric P Yansouni
AU  - Timothy Grant Evans
AU  - Jonathan Chevrier
AU  - Jesse Papenburg
AU  - Matthew P. Cheng
TI  - Global seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
AID  - 10.1101/2020.11.17.20233460
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.11.17.20233460
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/14/2020.11.17.20233460.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/14/2020.11.17.20233460.full
AB  - Background Many studies report the seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies. We aimed to synthesize seroprevalence data to better estimate the level and distribution of SARS-CoV-2 infection, identify high-risk groups, and inform public health decision making.Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched publication databases, preprint servers, and grey literature sources for seroepidemiological study reports, from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. We included studies that reported a sample size, study date, location, and seroprevalence estimate. We corrected estimates for imperfect test accuracy with Bayesian measurement error models, conducted meta-analysis to identify demographic differences in the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and meta-regression to identify study-level factors associated with seroprevalence. We compared region-specific seroprevalence data to confirmed cumulative incidence. PROSPERO: CRD42020183634.Results We identified 968 seroprevalence studies including 9.3 million participants in 74 countries. There were 472 studies (49%) at low or moderate risk of bias. Seroprevalence was low in the general population (median 4.5%, IQR 2.4-8.4%); however, it varied widely in specific populations from low (0.6% perinatal) to high (59% persons in assisted living and long-term care facilities). Median seroprevalence also varied by Global Burden of Disease region, from 0.6 % in Southeast Asia, East Asia and Oceania to 19.5% in Sub-Saharan Africa (p<0.001). National studies had lower seroprevalence estimates than regional and local studies (p<0.001). Compared to Caucasian persons, Black persons (prevalence ratio [RR] 3.37, 95% CI 2.64-4.29), Asian persons (RR 2.47, 95% CI 1.96-3.11), Indigenous persons (RR 5.47, 95% CI 1.01-32.6), and multi-racial persons (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.60-2.24) were more likely to be seropositive. Seroprevalence was higher among people ages 18-64 compared to 65 and over (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.45). Health care workers in contact with infected persons had a 2.10 times (95% CI 1.28-3.44) higher risk compared to health care workers without known contact. There was no difference in seroprevalence between sex groups. Seroprevalence estimates from national studies were a median 18.1 times (IQR 5.9-38.7) higher than the corresponding SARS-CoV-2 cumulative incidence, but there was large variation between Global Burden of Disease regions from 6.7 in South Asia to 602.5 in Sub-Saharan Africa. Notable methodological limitations of serosurveys included absent reporting of test information, no statistical correction for demographics or test sensitivity and specificity, use of non-probability sampling and use of non-representative sample frames.Discussion Most of the population remains susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Public health measures must be improved to protect disproportionately affected groups, including racial and ethnic minorities, until vaccine-derived herd immunity is achieved. Improvements in serosurvey design and reporting are needed for ongoing monitoring of infection prevalence and the pandemic response.Funding Public Health Agency of Canada through the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force.Competing Interest StatementDAC reports personal fees from Oxford University Innovation, Biobeats, and Sensyne Health. MPC reports grants from McGill Interdisciplinary Initiative in Infection and Immunity and grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Gen1E Lifesciences (as a member of the scientific advisory board) and personal fees from nplex biosciences (as a member of the scientific advisory board), both outside the submitted work. JP reports grants and personal fees from Seegene and AbbVie, grants from MedImmune and Sanofi Pasteur, outside the submitted work. RKA, NB, and TY report grants from the World Health Organization and the Canadian Medical Association for SARS-CoV-2 serosurveillance, both outside the submitted work.Funding StatementThis research was funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada through the Canadian COVID-19 Immunity Task Force. Our funding source had no role in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication. We have not been paid to write this article by a pharmaceutical company or other agency. The corresponding author (NB) confirms that all authors had full access to the full data in the study and accepts responsibility to submit for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This review was preregistered with the protocol available in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020183634)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesN/A https://serotracker.com/