PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Vasiliki Bountziouka AU - Christopher P Nelson AU - Veryan Codd AU - Qingning Wang AU - Crispin Musicha AU - Elias Allara AU - Stephen Kaptoge AU - Emanuele Di Angelantonio AU - Adam S Butterworth AU - John R Thompson AU - Elizabeth M Curtis AU - Angela M Wood AU - John N Danesh AU - Nicholas C Harvey AU - Cyrus Cooper AU - Nilesh J Samani TI - Association of leucocyte telomere length with frailty: a large–scale cross–sectional analysis in UK Biobank AID - 10.1101/2021.06.11.21258736 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.06.11.21258736 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/13/2021.06.11.21258736.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/13/2021.06.11.21258736.full AB - Background Leucocyte telomere length (LTL), a potential marker of biological age, has been associated with risk of many diseases. We investigated whether LTL is associated with risk of frailty, a multidimensional syndrome of decline that affects multiple systems and predisposes to adverse health outcomes.Methods In a cross–sectional analysis, we studied 441,781 UK Biobank participants (aged 40–70 years), with complete data on LTL and frailty indicators. We defined frailty as the presence of at least three of five indicators: weaker grip strength, slower walking pace, weight loss in the past year, lower physical activity, and exhaustion in the past two weeks. We evaluated association of LTL with frailty using adjusted (chronological age, sex, deprivation, smoking, alcohol intake, body mass index, multimorbidity) multinomial and ordinal regression models. We used Mendelian randomisation (MR), using 131 genetic variants associated with LTL, to assess if the association of LTL with frailty was causal.Findings Frail participants (4·6%) were older (median age difference (95% CI): 3 (2·5; 3·5) years), more likely to be female (61%), and had shorter LTL (−0·13SD vs 0·03SD) than non–frail. In adjusted analyses, both age and LTL were associated with frailty (OR=1·03 (95%CI: 1·02–1·04) per year of older chronological age; 1·10 (1·08; 1·11) per SD shorter LTL). Within each age group (40–49, 50–59, 60–69 years) the prevalence of frailty was about 33% higher in participants with shorter (−2SD) versus longer telomeres (+2SD). MR analysis showed an association of LTL with frailty that was directionally consistent with the observational association, but not statistically significant.Interpretation Inter–individual variation in LTL is associated with the risk of frailty independently of chronological age and other risk factors. Our findings provide evidence for an additional biological determinant of frailty.Funding The UK Medical Research Council, the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and the British Heart Foundation (MRC grant: MR/M012816/1) funded our measurements of LTL in UK Biobank. The funders had no role in study design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; the writing of the report; and the decision to submit the paper for publication.Evidence before this study Telomere length has been proposed as a biomarker of biological age. Shorter leucocyte telomere length (LTL) is associated with higher incidence of several age–associated diseases, spanning multiple body systems, and with lower life expectancy. However, the association of shorter LTL with frailty, a multidimensional syndrome of decline across multiple systems, is inconclusive. We searched PubMed using the terms “telomere length AND frailty” in the title, abstract, or text with no language restrictions. This search identified 50 papers published before 30 November, 2020. Of these, three systematic reviews and/ or meta–analyses of modest size (five to nine studies, with total n<10,000) and 11 original research articles reported on associations between telomere length and frailty. These small–scale studies, primarily in older individuals, do not support an independent association between shorter LTL and higher risk of frailty.Added value of this study Our large–scale population–based study, involving over 441,000 participants, provides strong evidence that shorter LTL is associated with higher risk of both pre–frailty and frailty even after adjustment for chronological age and other established determinants of frailty, namely, age, sex, alcohol intake, smoking, obesity, deprivation and multimorbidity. Within each age group (40–49, 50–59, 60–69 years) the prevalence of frailty was about 33% higher in participants with shorter (−2SD) versus longer telomeres (+2SD). Part of the association of shorter LTL with higher risk of frailty may be due to the association in aggregate of LTL with diseases. Findings using genetic variants associated with LTL as instruments were directionally consistent with the observational association, but not statistically significant.Implications of all the available evidence Shorter LTL is associated with frailty independent of chronological age and several other risk factors. The observation that risk of frailty associated with shorter LTL is proportionately similar across the age range of 40–70 years suggests that shorter LTL acts through a mechanism beyond just accelerating the impact of chronological ageing on risk of frailty.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application Number 6077. Generation of the LTL measurements was funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC), Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and British Heart Foundation (BHF) through MRC grant MR/M012816/1.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:UK Biobank has approval from the North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee (MREC), which covers the UK. It also sought the approval in England and Wales from the Patient Information Advisory Group (PIAG) for gaining access to information that would allow it to invite people to participate. PIAG has since been replaced by the National Information Governance Board for Health & Social Care (NIGB). In Scotland, UK Biobank has approval from the Community Health Index Advisory Group (CHIAG). This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application Number 6077.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe MTA with UK Biobank precludes direct data sharing. All derived data are deposited back to UK Biobank and are available upon request to UK Biobank. Dissemination of the findings to study participants will be through the UK Biobank website.