RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Technology-delivered undergraduate medical education involving patients and carers: A rapid systematic review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.07.21256812
DO 10.1101/2021.05.07.21256812
A1 Sadie Lawes-Wickwar
A1 Eitan Lovat
A1 Adedoyin Alao
A1 Julia Hamer-Hunt
A1 Nesrin Yurtoglu
A1 Cherise Jensen
A1 Nicola Clarke
A1 Nia Roberts
A1 Sophie Park
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/12/2021.05.07.21256812.abstract
AB Background Involving patients and carers in medical education centralises their voice in healthcare and supports students to develop key professional and person-centred skills. Medical schools are increasingly using technology to deliver educational activities. No review currently exists to establish the variety of technologies and their uses in undergraduate medical education when patients and/or carers are involved.Methods Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE and medRxiv were searched in October 2020 and reference lists of key articles were hand searched. Eligible studies reported technology-assisted education, in any setting, involving authentic patients and/or carers. Studies in foreign languages, or describing actors or non-authentic patients were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Levels of patient involvement were assessed using Towle et al’s (2010) taxonomy.Results Twenty studies were included. The majority involved patients and/or carers via pre-recorded videos or online scenarios, with no student-interaction. Four studies evaluated remote consultations using telehealth technology, involving real-time interactions with authentic patients. Technology-supported teaching sessions involving patients and/or carers were found to be acceptable to students, educationally valuable (to students and educators), and enhanced student engagement, patient-centred attitudes, knowledge of specific patient groups, and communication and clinical skills. Two studies describing real-time remote interactions with authentic patients indicated potential barriers for students (reduced ability to build relationship with patients and examine them), educators (reduced ability to build rapport with students) and patients (issues with using or accessing telehealth).Conclusions No studies directly measured the perspective of patients or carers involved in technology-delivered medical education. Future research should establish barriers and facilitators to patients and carers taking up a role in medical students’ education when technology is used, and evaluate PPI activities at Levels 3 and above as described by Towle et al’s taxonomy.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care (SPCR) and University College London (UCL).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not applicableAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesNot applicable