PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Vinícius Mallmann Schneider
AU  - Paula Frank
AU  - Sandra C. Fuchs
AU  - Rodrigo Ferrari
TI  - Effects of recreational sports and combined training on blood pressure and glycosylated hemoglobin in middle-aged and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
AID  - 10.1101/2021.05.05.21256401
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.05.05.21256401
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/07/2021.05.05.21256401.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/07/2021.05.05.21256401.full
AB  - Background Combined resistance and aerobic training (CT) is the most suitable form of exercise training to simultaneously improve cardiometabolic profile and functional capacity in middle-aged and older adults. Recreational sports (RS) emerge as an alternative to traditional exercises to improve these outcomes that could be used as a retention and continuity strategy, promoting health benefits associated with pleasure and satisfaction during the physical activity.Objectives The aim was to conduct a meta-analysis on the effects of RS and CT on systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in middle-aged and older adults and to compare these exercise interventions to a non-exercising control group (CON).Data Sources A literature search was conducted using the databases at PubMed, COCHRANE and SciELO between July and August 2020.Study Eligibility Criteria Studies that included men and women aged ≥45 years, healthy or with values of baseline for SBP ≥130mmHg or DBP ≥80 mmHg or with type II diabetes, in which the participants performed RS or CT versus CON, and evaluated SBP, DBP and HbA1c.Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods Two independent reviewers screened search results, performed data extraction, and assessed of methodological quality of studies. Random effects modeling was used to compare pre-to post-intervention changes in BP and HbA1c from RS and CT versus CON, and the effect size were calculated through the weighted mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).Results From 6017 records, 27 studies were included (9 RS and 18 CT interventions). The analysis included 1411 participants with 55 ± 8 years (range, 45–73 years). Overall, RS was associated reduction in SBP (MD: -7.20 mmHg; CI: -13.7 to -0.7) and DBP (MD: -3.6 mmHg; 95%CI: -6.6 to -0.5) versus CON. CT reduction SBP (MD: -3.6 mmHg; 95%CI: -5.2 to -2.0) and DBP (MD: -3.10 mmHg; 95%CI: -3.75 to -2.44) versus CON. RS not reduced HbA1c (MD: -0.24 %; CI: -0.53 to 0.06) versus CON. However, CT reduced HbA1c (MD: -0.47%; 95%CI: -0.67 to -0.27) versus CON.Conclusions RS and CT are effective exercise interventions to improve blood pressure in middle-aged and older adults. Additionally, CT seems to be an excellent strategy to reduce HbA1c, and future studies are necessary to confirm the effectiveness of recreational sports to improve HbA1c.Systematic Review Registration Number CRD42020207250Key Points Recreational sports promote similar or even greater blood pressure reduction when compared to traditional exercises.Combined training promotes improvements in blood pressure and HbA1c in aging adults.As alternative to traditional exercises, recreational sports emerge as an effective strategy to improve the cardiometabolic profile in middle-aged and older adults.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialSystematic Review Registration Number CRD42020207250Clinical Protocols https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=207250 Funding StatementNo sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York York, UKAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.