RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 UK Health Care Workers’ Experiences of Major System Change in Elective Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Reflections on Rapid Service Adaptation
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.14.21255415
DO 10.1101/2021.04.14.21255415
A1 Singleton, Georgina
A1 Dowrick, Anna
A1 Manby, Louisa
A1 Fillmore, Harrison
A1 Syverson, Aron
A1 Lewis-Jackson, Sasha
A1 Uddin, Inayah
A1 Sumray, Kirsi
A1 Bautista-González, Elysse
A1 Johnson, Ginger
A1 Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/20/2021.04.14.21255415.abstract
AB Background The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the delivery of elective surgery in the UK. The majority of planned surgery was cancelled or postponed in March 2020 for the duration of the first wave of the pandemic. We investigated the experiences of staff responsible for delivering rapid changes to surgical services during the first wave of the pandemic in the UK, with the aim of developing lessons for future major systems change.Methods Using a rapid qualitative study design, we conducted 25 interviews with frontline surgical staff during the first wave of the pandemic. We also carried out a policy review of the guidance developed for those delivering surgical services in pandemic conditions. We used framework analysis to organise and interpret findings.Results Staff discussed positive and negative experiences of rapid service organisation. Clinician-led decision making, the flexibility of individual staff and teams, and the opportunity to innovate service design were all seen as positive contributors to success in service adaptation. The negative aspects of rapid change were inconsistent guidance from national government and medical bodies, top-down decisions about when to cancel and restart surgery, the challenges of delivering emergency surgical care safely and the complexity of prioritising surgical cases when services re-started.Conclusion Success in the rapid reorganisation of elective surgical services can be attributed to the flexibility and adaptability of staff. However, there was an absence of involvement of staff in wider system-level pandemic decision-making and competing guidance from national bodies. Involving staff in decisions about the organisation and delivery of major systems change is essential for the sustainability of change processes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study did not receive external funding. Research costs were covered with existing funding provided by the Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), UCL. All researchers acted independently from the funding source and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was reviewed and approved by the Health Research Authority (HRA) in the United Kingdom (IRAS: 282069) and the Research and Development (R&D) offices of the hospitals where the study took place.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article or its supplementary materials.