PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Navin Kumar AU - Isabel Corpus AU - Meher Hans AU - Nikhil Harle AU - Nan Yang AU - Curtis McDonald AU - Shinpei Nakamura Sakai AU - Kamila Janmohamed AU - Weiming Tang AU - Jason L. Schwartz AU - S. Mo Jones-Jang AU - Koustuv Saha AU - Shahan Ali Memon AU - Chris T. Bauch AU - Munmun De Choudhury AU - Orestis Papakyriakopoulos AU - Joseph D. Tucker AU - Abhay Goyal AU - Aman Tyagi AU - Kaveh Khoshnood AU - Saad Omer TI - COVID-19 vaccine perceptions: An observational study on Reddit AID - 10.1101/2021.04.09.21255229 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.04.09.21255229 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/13/2021.04.09.21255229.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/13/2021.04.09.21255229.full AB - Objectives As COVID-19 vaccinations accelerate in many countries, narratives skeptical of vaccination have also spread through social media. Open online forums like Reddit provide an opportunity to quantitatively examine COVID-19 vaccine perceptions over time. We examine COVID-19 misinformation on Reddit following vaccine scientific announcements.Methods We collected all posts on Reddit from January 1 2020 - December 14 2020 (n=266,840) that contained both COVID-19 and vaccine-related keywords. We used topic modeling to understand changes in word prevalence within topics after the release of vaccine trial data. Social network analysis was also conducted to determine the relationship between Reddit communities (subreddits) that shared COVID-19 vaccine posts, and the movement of posts between subreddits.Results There was an association between a Pfizer press release reporting 90% efficacy and increased discussion on vaccine misinformation. We observed an association between Johnson and Johnson temporarily halting its vaccine trials and reduced misinformation. We found that information skeptical of vaccination was first posted in a subreddit (r/Coronavirus) which favored accurate information and then reposted in subreddits associated with antivaccine beliefs and conspiracy theories (e.g. conspiracy, LockdownSkepticism).Conclusions Our findings can inform the development of interventions where individuals determine the accuracy of vaccine information, and communications campaigns to improve COVID-19 vaccine perceptions. Such efforts can increase individual- and population-level awareness of accurate and scientifically sound information regarding vaccines and thereby improve attitudes about vaccines. Further research is needed to understand how social media can contribute to COVID-19 vaccination services.Funding Study was funded by the Yale Institute for Global Health and the Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies at Yale University. The funding bodies had no role in the design, analysis or interpretation of the data in the study.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementStudy was funded by the Yale Institute for Global Health and the Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies at Yale University. The funding bodies had no role in the design, analysis or interpretation of the data in the study. This study was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study did not involve human subjects.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available from authors' at reasonable request.