PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Webb, Brandon J.
AU  - Buckel, Whitney
AU  - Vento, Todd
AU  - Butler, Allison M.
AU  - Grisel, Nancy
AU  - Brown, Samuel M.
AU  - Peltan, Ithan D.
AU  - Spivak, Emily S.
AU  - Shah, Mark
AU  - Sakata, Theadora
AU  - Wallin, Anthony
AU  - Stenehjem, Eddie
AU  - Poulsen, Greg
AU  - Bledsoe, Joseph
TI  - Real-World Effectiveness and Tolerability of Monoclonal Antibodies for Ambulatory Patients with Early COVID-19
AID  - 10.1101/2021.03.15.21253646
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.03.15.21253646
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/17/2021.03.15.21253646.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/17/2021.03.15.21253646.full
AB  - Importance Interventions to reduce hospitalization of patients with COVID-19 are urgently needed. Randomized trials for efficacy suggest that anti-SARS-CoV2 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAb) may reduce medically-attended visits and hospitalization but effectiveness has not been confirmed in a real-world setting.Objective Estimate the effectiveness of MAb infusion in a real-world cohort of ambulatory patients with early symptomatic COVID-19 at high risk for hospitalization.Design Quasi-experimental observational cohort study using target trial emulation and causal inference methodology in pre-and post-implementation groups.Setting Infusion centers and urgent care clinics within an integrated healthcare system in the United StatesParticipants 13,534 high-risk adult outpatients with symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 within 7 days of symptom onset.Exposures A single intravenous infusion of either bamlanivimab 700 mg or casirivimab/imdevimab 1200 mg/1200 mg.Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was emergency department visit or hospitalization within 14 days of positive test. Patients who received MAb infusion were compared to contemporaneous controls using inverse probability of treatment weighting, and to a pre-implementation cohort using propensity-weighted interrupted time series analysis. An exploratory analysis compared effectiveness of casirivimab/imdevimab and bamlanivimab.Results 7404 patients who would have been MAb-eligible were identified in a pre-implementation cohort (July 1-November 27, 2020). In the post-implementation period (November 28, 2020-January 28, 2021), 594 received MAb treatment and 5536 MAb-eligible patients did not. Among Mab recipients, 479 (80.6%) received bamlanivimab and 115 (19.4%) casirivimab/imdevimab. The primary outcome occurred in 75 (12.6%) MAb recipients, 1018 (18.4%) contemporaneous controls, and 1525 (20.6%) patients in the pre-implementation cohort. MAb treatment was associated with fewer subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalizations (odds ratio estimating the average treatment effect 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.79). After implementation, propensity-weighted probability of emergency department visit or hospitalization decreased by 0.7% per day (95% CI 0.03-0.10%, p<0.001). Overall, 7 (1.2%) MAb patients experienced an adverse event; two (0.3%) were considered serious. In the exploratory analysis, the effect of casirivimab/imdevimab versus bamlanivimab was not significant (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.17-1.63, p=0.26).Conclusions and Relevance MAb treatment of high-risk ambulatory patients with early COVID-19 was well-tolerated and effective at preventing the need for subsequent medically-attended care.Question What is the real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 monoclonal neutralizing antibody (MAb) infusions in high-risk, ambulatory patients?Findings 594 high-risk, early-symptomatic adults with COVID-19 treated with MAb infusion were compared to 5536 contemporaneous controls using inverse probability of treatment weighting, and to 7404 patients in a pre-implementation cohort using propensity-weighted interrupted time series analysis. MAb treatment was associated with fewer subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalizations (odds ratio 0.69 (95% CI 0.60-0.79). After MAb implementation the probability of emergency department visit or hospitalization decreased by 0.7% per day, 95% CI 0.03-0.10%, p<0.001).Meaning Monoclonal antibody infusion within seven days of symptom onset in high-risk ambulatory adults with COVID-19 appears to prevent subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalization. Further evaluation of the differences between specific Mab products is warranted.Competing Interest StatementAt the time of submission, Intermountain Healthcare and the University of Utah have participated in COVID-19 trials sponsored by: Abbvie, Genentech, Gilead, Regeneron, Roche, the U.S. NIH ACTIV, ACTT and PETAL clinical trials networks and the Department of Defense. This included inpatient trials studying casirivimab/imdevimab (sponsor: Regeneron) and bamlanivimab (sponsor: NIH/Operation Warp Spee). Several authors (BW, IDP, JB, SMB, ES, ESS) were site investigators on these trials but received no direct or indirect remuneration for their effort. ESS, BJW, SMB and MS are members of the Utah Crisis Standards of Care Scarce Medications Allocation Subcommittee.Funding StatementIDP reports salary support through a grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and, outside the present study, grant support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Janssen and support to his institution from Asahi Kasei Pharma. SMB reports salary support from the U.S. NIH, CDC and the Department of Defense; he also reports receiving support for chairing a data and safety monitoring board for a respiratory failure trial sponsored by Hamilton, effort paid to Intermountain for steering committee work for Faron Pharmaceuticals and Sedana Pharmaceuticals for ARDS work, support from Janssen for Influenza research, and royalties for books on religion and ethics from Oxford University Press/Brigham Young University. BJW reports partial salary support outside of this study from a grant from the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). ES receives partial salary support through grants from the CDC and AHRQ. ESS serves on Gilead Sciences Advisory Board for Remdesivir.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was submitted to the Intermountain Institutional Review Board and determined to be exempt from full committee review.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesIn order to protect patient privacy and comply with institutional data use policy, data used in this study are unavailable to upload to public servers. As required by the Intermountain Healthcare Institutional Review Board, data sharing agreement requests to access deidentified versions of the datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study may be addressed to the Intermountain Office of Research (officeofresearch@imail.org).