PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Azeem Ahmad
AU  - Manohar S. Gundeti
AU  - Parth P. Dave
AU  - Sophia Jameela
AU  - Shruti Khanduri
AU  - B.C.S. Rao
AU  - N. Srikanth
TI  - Efficacy and safety of Ayurveda interventions for Sinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
AID  - 10.1101/2021.03.11.21253190
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.03.11.21253190
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/12/2021.03.11.21253190.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/12/2021.03.11.21253190.full
AB  - Objectives To provide a broad evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Ayurveda interventions (procedural and non-procedural) for the management of sinusitis, and also of the relative efficacy and safety of different Ayurveda therapies for Sinusitis.Methods Two reviewers independently screened search results from electronic databases viz. Cochrane Library, PubMed(central), AYUSH Research Portal, and DHARA for published research articles and Shodhganga, RGUHS library, and ARD-IPGT&RA for the unpublished doctoral thesis. Trial registries (CTRI, Clinicaltrials.gov & WHO-ICTRP), and hand searches were also done for other relevant studies from inception to August 2020.All comparative clinical trials recruiting sinusitis patients of any age group, receiving Ayurveda intervention, regardless of forms, dosages, ingredients, and mode of interventions, for not less than one week were included. The data extraction and the risk of bias assessment were done by two reviewers independently. Protocol registration number: RD42018103995.Results We included 10 trials (387 participants) for qualitative analysis and 07 trials (287 participants) for quantitative analysis. Ayurveda intervention demonstrated potential in reducing signs and symptoms of sinusitis compared with placebo (Risk Ratio ranges 6.33 to 12.67, 1 trial, 80 participants). Combined Ayurveda therapy (CT) was statistically more beneficial compared with either procedural or non-procedural Ayurveda therapy alone in reducing symptoms nasal discharge (standardized MD −0.71, 95% CI −1.16 to −0.26, I2 58%, 10 comparisons, 210 participants) and headache (standardized MD −0.44, 95% CI −0.86 to −0.02, I2 56%, 10 comparisons, 218 participants), however, no significant difference was found in reducing symptoms nasal obstruction and loss of smell. Also, there was no significant difference found in similar outcomes while comparing Ayurveda procedural therapy with non-procedural therapy. No numerical data related to the safety of Ayurveda intervention was found in included trials.Conclusions Despite very low certainty in results (downgraded twice for RoB, once for inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision each), Ayurveda intervention (CT) may have some beneficial effects in the management of Sinusitis. However, due to insufficient data, we could not conclude on the safety aspect. There is a need for well-designed-executed-reported clinical studies for the generation of evidence.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018103995 Funding StatementThis review was funded by Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences(CCRAS), Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India, and all authors are working as Research officers for this Council.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:As this is a systematic review of published research work, RB/oversight body approval was exempted.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.DHARADigital Helpline for Ayurveda Research ArticlesRGUHSRajiv Gandhi University of Health SciencesARD-IPGT&RAAyurvedic Research Database-Institute for Postgraduate Teaching and Research in AyurvedaCTRIClinical Trial Registry IndiaWHO-ICTRPWorld Health Organization-International Clinical Trials Registry PlatformCTCombined Ayurveda therapySTSingle TherapyPTProcedural TherapyNPTNon-Procedural TherapyOPDOutpatient departmentIPDInpatient departmentSMDStandardized Mean DifferenceSDsStandard deviationsCIConfidance InervalRRRisk ratioRSRhinosinusitisCRSChronic RhinosinusitisARCAcute rhinosinusitisPRISMAPreferred Reporting Guideline for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelinesPROSPEROInternational prospective register of systematic reviewsRCTsRandomized controlled trialsnRCTsNon-randomized trialsSAESerious adverse eventsAEAdverse eventsADRAdverse drug reactionP.G.Post GraduateRoBRisk of BiasROBINS-IRisk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of InterventionsGRADEGrading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and EvaluationCBCComplete Blood CountPICOTPopulation, Intervention, Control, TimepointSoFSummary of FindingCONSORTConsolidated Standards of Reporting TrialsCCRASCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic SciencesIIPHIndian Institute of Public HealthAAAzeem AhmadMGManohar GundetiPDParth DaveSJSophia JameelaBCSBhogavalli Chandrashekhar RaoSKShruti KhanduriSNSrikanth Narayanam