PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Wray, Jo
AU  - Pagel, Christina
AU  - Chester, Adrian H.
AU  - Kennedy, Fiona
AU  - Crowe, Sonya
TI  - The impact of the first wave of COVID-19 on those with lifelong conditions: a case study of congenital heart disease
AID  - 10.1101/2021.01.13.21249447
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.01.13.21249447
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/15/2021.01.13.21249447.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/15/2021.01.13.21249447.full
AB  - Objectives Globally, health care systems have been stretched to the limit by the COVID-19 pandemic. Significant changes have had to be made to the way in which non-COVID-19 related care has been delivered. Our objective was to understand, from the perspective of patients with a chronic, life-long condition (congenital heart disease, CHD) and their parents/carers, the impact of COVID-19 on the delivery of care, how changes were communicated and whether health care providers should do anything differently in a subsequent wave of COVID-19 infections.Design and setting A series of asynchronous discussion forums set up and moderated by three patient charities via their Facebook pages.Participants Patients with CHD and parents/carers of patients with CHD.Main outcome measures Qualitative responses to questions posted on the discussion forums.Results The forums ran over a 6-week period and involved 111 participants. Following thematic analysis of the transcripts, we identified three themes and ten subthemes related to individual condition-related factors, patient-related factors and health professional/centre factors that may have influenced how patients and parents/carers experienced changes to service delivery as a result of COVID-19.Conclusions Our findings, whilst collected in relation to patients with CHD, are not necessarily specific to this population and we believe reflect the experiences of many thousands of people with life-long conditions in the UK. Drawing on what participants told us in the discussion forums, we have developed recommendations related to communication, service delivery and support during the pandemic that would, we think, improve patients’ experience of care and, potentially, their outcomes. Although the data were collected specifically in relation to COVID-19, a number of these recommendations are relevant to the wider delivery of care to patients with chronic underlying health conditions and reflect principles of good communication and service delivery.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (Policy Research Programme, Congenital Heart Audit: Measuring Progress In Outcomes Nationally (CHAMPION), PR-R20-0318-23001). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The online forums are an element of a larger study which was reviewed and granted ethical approval by North of Scotland Research Ethics Service (20/NS/0022). The ethics committee confirmed that specific ethical approval was not required for the online forums because the online forums were moderated by patient charities (and the researchers had no contact with or identifying information about the participants).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe nature of the qualitative data, whilst anonymised, would potentially allow for identification of participants and the data have therefore not been made available.