RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Interventions to prevent neonatal healthcare-associated infections in low-resource settings: a systematic review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.12.17.20248047
DO 10.1101/2020.12.17.20248047
A1 Felicity C. Fitzgerald
A1 Walter Zingg
A1 Gwendoline Chimhini
A1 Simbarashe Chimhuya
A1 Stefanie Wittmann
A1 Helen Brotherton
A1 Ioana D. Olaru
A1 Samuel R. Neal
A1 Neal Russell
A1 André Ricardo Araujo da Silva
A1 Mike Sharland
A1 Anna C Seale
A1 Mark F Cotton
A1 Susan Coffin
A1 Angela Dramowski
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/19/2020.12.17.20248047.abstract
AB Background Clinically suspected and laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infections are frequent causes of morbidity and mortality during neonatal care. The most effective infection prevention and control (IPC) interventions for neonates in low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC) are unknown.Aim To identify effective interventions in the prevention of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in LMIC neonatal units.Methods Medline, PUBMED, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, and PsychInfo (January 2003 – October 2020) were searched to identify studies reporting single or bundled interventions for prevention of bloodstream infections in LMIC neonatal units.Results Our initial search identified 5206 articles; following application of filters, 27 publications met the inclusion and ICROMS assessment criteria and were summarised in the final analysis. No studies were carried out in low-income countries, only one in sub-Saharan Africa and just two in multiple countries. Of the 18 single intervention studies, most targeted skin (n=4) and gastrointestinal mucosal integrity (n=5). Whereas emollient therapy and lactoferrin achieved significant reductions in proven neonatal infection, glutamine and mixed probiotics showed no benefit. Chlorhexidine gluconate for cord care and kangaroo mother care reduced infection in individual single-centre studies. Of the nine studies evaluating bundles, most focused on prevention of device-associated infections and achieved significant reductions in catheter- and ventilator-associated infections.Conclusion There is a limited evidence-base for the effectiveness of IPC interventions in LMIC neonatal units; bundled interventions targeting device-associated infections were most effective. More multi-site studies with robust study designs are needed to inform IPC intervention strategies in low-resource neonatal units.Sources of Support FF is supported by the Academy of Medical Sciences, the funders of the Starter Grant for Clinical Lecturers scheme and UCL Great Ormond Street NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. AD is supported by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health, Emerging Global Leader Award Number K43-TW010682.Competing Interest StatementNR: Unrelated consultancy for Save the Children and World Health Organization, and employed by Medecins sans Frontieres IDO received funding though the Wellcome Trust Clinical PhD Programme awarded to the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (grant number 203905/Z/16/Z). HB was funded by The Wellcome Trust [Ref. 200116/Z/15/Z], who played no role in the trial design, conduct and did not contribute to the analysis or interpretation of data or the writing of this manuscript. ARADS Associate editor- Antimicrobial resistance and Infection control (current). FF is supported by the Academy of Medical Sciences, the funders of the Starter Grant for Clinical Lecturers scheme and UCL Great Ormond Street NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. AD is supported by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health, Emerging Global Leader Award Number K43-TW010682.Funding StatementFF is supported by the Academy of Medical Sciences, the funders of the Starter Grant for Clinical Lecturers scheme and UCL Great Ormond Street NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. AD is supported by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health, Emerging Global Leader Award Number K43-TW010682.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Systematic Review of previously published data so no IRB review neededAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesSystematic Review of Previously published data