PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Thomas Aleksander Øverby AU - Rune B. Jakobsen TI - Infections after routine syndesmotic screw removal – a retrospective quality study AID - 10.1101/2020.10.30.20222216 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.10.30.20222216 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/03/2020.10.30.20222216.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/03/2020.10.30.20222216.full AB - Background Infections after routine removal of syndesmotic screws are an unwanted complication.Methods We included all patients treated with syndesmotic screw with routine removal in a five-year period and extracted information regarding fracture characteristics and patient characteristics. Infections were classified as superficial or deep incisional.Results 1246 patients with ankle fractures were treated surgically in the study period. 343 had routine removals of the syndesmotic screw. We identified 6 cases with infection (1.7%) developing after routine syndesmotic screw removal.Conclusions We found a low infection rate but when infections did occur, they frequently required surgical revision(s) and long-time antibiotic treatment.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe project did not receive any specific funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The project was approved the by the Board of Research at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and the Data Protection Official of our institution (#16-085)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAnonymized dataset is available upon request, please contact the last author.