RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 AI-Powered Effective Lens Position Prediction Improves the Accuracy of Existing Lens Formulas
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.29.20222539
DO 10.1101/2020.10.29.20222539
A1 Li, Tingyang
A1 Stein, Joshua D.
A1 Nallasamy, Nambi
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/03/2020.10.29.20222539.abstract
AB Aims To assess whether incorporating a machine learning (ML) method for accurate prediction of postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) improves the refraction prediction performance of existing intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas.Methods A dataset of 4806 cataract patients were gathered at the Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, and split into a training set (80% of patients, 5761 eyes) and a testing set (20% of patients, 961 eyes). A previously developed ML-based method was used to predict the postoperative ACD based on preoperative biometry. This ML-based postoperative ACD was integrated into new effective lens position (ELP) predictions using regression models to rescale the ML output for each of four existing formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay, and SRK/T). The performance of the formulas with ML-modified ELP was compared using a testing dataset. Performance was measured by the mean absolute error (MAE) in refraction prediction.Results When the ELP was replaced with a linear combination of the original ELP and the ML-predicted ELP, the MAEs ± SD (in Diopters) in the testing set were: 0.356 ± 0.329 for Haigis, 0.352 ± 0.319 for Hoffer Q, 0.371 ± 0.336 for Holladay, and 0.361 ± 0.331 for SRK/T which were significantly lower than those of the original formulas: 0.373 ± 0.328 for Haigis, 0.408 ± 0.337 for Hoffer Q, 0.384 ± 0.341 for Holladay, and 0.394 ± 0.351 for SRK/T.Conclusion Using a more accurately predicted postoperative ACD significantly improves the prediction accuracy of four existing IOL power formulas.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Lighthouse Guild, New York, NY (JDS) and National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD, 1R01EY026641-01A1 (JDS).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study has been approved by the IRB at the University of MichiganAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are not publicly available.