RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Parental acceptance toward behavior guidance techniques for pediatric dental visits: a meta-analysis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.13.20212191
DO 10.1101/2020.10.13.20212191
A1 Carla Massignan
A1 Josiane Pezzini Soares
A1 Maria Marlene de Souza Pires
A1 Bruce D. Dick
A1 André Luís Porporatti
A1 Graziela De Luca Canto
A1 Michele Bolan
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/15/2020.10.13.20212191.abstract
AB Objective The systematic review aimed to compare agreement with behavior guidance techniques (BGT) between parents of children with special health care needs (SHCN) and those non-SHCN.Methods A structured search of Cochrane Library, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences, PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database, Opengrey and Google Scholar was taken up to October 2020. Two authors selected studies independently, extracted the data, assessed the studies’ methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs scale and the Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).Results Forty-eight studies covering the parents’ agreement with BGT were included and 41 were retained for random-effects proportion meta-analysis. The methodological quality assessment varied from low to high. Among the parents of non-SHCN children, the agreement with BGT varied from 84.1% (95% CI: 75.8-90.9; p<0.001; I2 93.3%) for tell-show-do to 25.7% (95% CI: 17.8-34.4; p<0.001; I2 90.4%) for passive protective stabilization, without hand-over-mouth. Among the parents of children with SHCN, the acceptance of BGT varied from 89.1% (95% CI: 56.1-99.7; p<0.001; I2 95.7%) for tell-show-do to 29.1% (95% CI: 11.8-50.0; p=0.001; I2 84.8%) to general anesthesia.Conclusion There is very low certainty in evidence that both the parents of children SHCN and non-SHCN were more likely to agree with basic BGT and that they were less likely to agree with the advanced ones.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialCRD42018103834Funding StatementNoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:There is no need for IRB approval for systematic review.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data are available by sending an email to carla.odontopediatra@gmail.com