ABSTRACT
Aims & Objectives
to identify competing definitions of Covid-19 through quantitative and qualitative analyses of online Long Covid narratives in the UK;
to map UK Long Haulers’ experiences, emotions and practices as articulated online;
to encourage further dialogue between patients, doctors and researchers to reassess existing definitions of Covid-19, with the collective aim of improving care and support for Long Haulers.
Design A rapid qualitative mixed methods study combining social media data (n=144,637 posts) with quantitative sentiment analysis and qualitative discourse analysis of themed post samples.
Setting Social media data studied were posts from people who self-reported having long- term symptoms of Covid-19. Data was analysed from the UK. All posts were anonymised to fit within ethics guidelines. No interventions were made.
Results Quantitative analysis found an output of 7,099 social media users who posted 144,637 posts. 27% of posts had negative sentiment, 12% were positive, 59% were neutral. The qualitative results demonstrate the negative impacts of competing definitions of Covid- 19 for Long Haulers in the UK. These are mainly: time/duration; symptoms/testing; emotional impact; support and resources.
Conclusions Through our analysis of UK Long Covid narratives online, we identify four main areas that need further urgent attention and reconsideration to improve support for Long Haulers: a) the time-frames assigned to Covid-19; b) the range of symptoms, which affects testing/diagnoses; c) the emotional/intellectual impact on Long Haulers; d) lack of resources and information.
SUMMARY: STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY
Our critical social media and discourse analysis of UK Long Covid narratives identify key discrepancies between ‘official’ and ‘non-official’ accounts of Covid-19 that require urgent consideration from a medical, governmental and social perspective.
Through social network sampling, we provide an initial mapping of the experiential, emotional and practical impacts Long Covid has had and continues to have on individuals in the UK, and the Long Hauler community as a whole.
We contribute towards the existing body of work conducted by doctors, researchers, and patients calling for the reassessment of existing definitions of Covid-19; to better understand Long Covid in order to improve support, guidelines and social measures offered to Long Haulers and their carers.
Demographics: our sample only analysed UK posts mostly on one social media platform due to the majority of posts coming from Twitter, and thus is not representative of the global population.
This highlights the need for: a) further comparative global studies; b) studies ensuring representation from those who might lack digital access and/or literacy); c) specific longitudinal and in-depth studies involving interviews/focus groups; d) a systematic cross-platform analyses to capture a greater demographic online.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Only publicly available news and social media posts were used in this research. All social media data was anonymised. No clinical trials were used.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The researchers have maintained the anonymity of all public social media posts cited. Any identifying features such as the names or photos have been removed from posts and data retrieved from social media.
