ABSTRACT
Background COVID-19 has affected millions of people worldwide. Clinical manifestations range from severe cases with a lethal outcome to mild or asymptomatic cases. Although there is the same proportion of infected genders, men are more susceptible to severe COVID-19, with a higher risk of death than women. This sex-bias may be explained by biological pathways.
Methods We performed an epidemiological survey from July 2020 to July 2021 including 1744 unvaccinated adult Brazilian couples with at least one infected spouse despite living together during the COVID-19 infection without protective measures. The presence or absence of infection was confirmed by RT-PCR and/or serology results. The couples were divided between groups where both partners were infected (concordant couples) or only one spouse remained asymptomatic despite the close contact with the infected one (discordant couples). Statistical analysis of the collected data was performed aiming to verify a differential transmitter potential between genders in household contact.
Results The combination of our data collected from concordant and discordant couples showed that the man is the first (or the only) affected in the major occurrences when compared to women. Our findings support other published surveys and are in concordance with previous studies of our group.
Conclusions These observations support the hypothesis according to which male individuals are more efficient virus transmitters than females, independently of the use of protective masks. In short, the present study confirmed the existence of gender differences not only for susceptibility to infection and resistance to COVID-19 but also in the transmission rate.
HIGHLIGHTS
There are sex differences in COVID-19 susceptibility and transmission between couples with direct contact without protective measures;
Men are more efficient virus transmitters than women;
Sex-bias in COVID-19 transmission can be explained by differences in viral load in saliva, immune response and also behavioural protective differences between genders.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
This is a retrospective epidemiological survey with adult Brazilian couples (mean age of 45 years old) who were living together during the COVID-19 infection event without protective measures.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by (FAPESP/Brazil) [grant numbers 2013/08028-1, 2014/50931-3 and 2020/09702-1], the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [grant number 465355/2014-5] and JBS S.A [grant number 69004].
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Committee for Ethics in Research of the Institute of Biosciences at the University of Sao Paulo (CAAE 34786620.2.0000.5464).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Individual level data can be shared by authors upon reasonable request.
